[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [FR] Enhancing footnote managment (via indirect buffer)?
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: [FR] Enhancing footnote managment (via indirect buffer)? |
Date: |
Wed, 24 May 2023 09:03:11 +0000 |
Payas Relekar <relekarpayas@gmail.com> writes:
> I've been playing with org-footnote-assistance, and this is again just
> another opinion, but I'm also preferring the indirect buffer. It just
> puts things in better perspective.
I'd prefer to integrate things with `org-edit-special', if possible.
Possibly extending `org-edit-special' functionality.
The pros for `org-edit-special' are that we can escape certain edge
cases. In particular, there is a known edge case when footnote
definition contains an src block with 2+ blank lines. The blank lines
are treated as the end of the footnote definition and src block is not
recognized. Also, `org-edit-footnote-reference' takes care about
removing common indentation.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
Fwd: [FR] Enhancing footnote managment (via indirect buffer)?, Andrea Lazzarini, 2023/05/26