Re: Is this proper time format?

[David Masterson]

Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:

> David Masterson <dsmasterson@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>>> Maybe I'm not explicit enough.  In section 8.1 of the Org 9.6 manual is
>>>> a subsection "Time/Date Range" that *implies* times are supported in
>>>> ranges by the use of words "time" and "timestamp" when, above, you're
>>>> saying they are undefined (unsupported?) for now.  I'm merely saying
>>>> adjust the manual to remove the implication.
>>>
>>> Please check the manual from main branch of Org. It has more text:
>>
>> I disagree. I cloned Org from Savannah and made the attached patch
>> file from the main branch.  First time for me attaching a file to a
>> message.   Does it work for you?
>
> Yes. Though it would be better to attach the diff with proper (.diff or
> .patch) extension.

I've updated my patch file taking into account what you mentioned and
what I tested.  Does this look all right?

patch_file.diff
Description: Patch of Org-Guide and Org-Manual

-- 
David Masterson