Re: [ANN] lisp/ob-tangle-sync.el

[Mehmet Tekman]

Hello

Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:
>
> > Mehmet Tekman <mtekman89@gmail.com> writes:
> > Question: What is the order of submission of patches?
> >
> >    Do I submit a testing patch first which works strictly with
> >    vanilla Org first, and then a new merge-params function, and
> >    then yet another testing patch that is compliant with the
> >    new merge-params function?
> >
> >    Or do I submit the new merge-params function, and then my
> >    testing patch on top?
>
> Either way is fine. The latter should be easier for you though.

I went with the former way. I just want to get a set of standardized
tests into org-mode that I can base a future branch on to really see
what is working and what is not.

> Also, see the attached modified version of your diff - I made it so
> that `should' failures immediately provide some clue about expected
> result value, that can help to identify which of the should clauses
> fails.

I've adapted this to write a git patch which currently passes with
upstream/main, and contains a few `should-not` statements which are
planned to be `should` statements after the merge function has been
patched for the `:tangle' multi-parameter property.

Best,
Mehmet

0001-testing-lisp-test-ob.el-test-ob-merge-params-new-test-v4-mtekman.patch
Description: Text Data