[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [BUG] Consider replacing bachload with batch in ob-maxima. [9.6.6 (r
From: |
Leo Butler |
Subject: |
Re: [BUG] Consider replacing bachload with batch in ob-maxima. [9.6.6 (release_9.6.6 @ /usr/share/emacs/30.0.50/lisp/org/)] |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Sep 2023 18:33:40 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) |
On Fri, Sep 01 2023, Lockywolf <for_org-bugs_2023-09-01@lockywolf.net> wrote:
> Dear org developers,
>
> At the moment, ob-maxima has a straightforward way of evaluating
> babel blocks,
>
> #+begin_src shell
> maxima --very-quiet -r batchload\(\"/tmp/ob-maximaFOOBAR.mac\"\)\$
> #+end_src
>
> (line 87 of ob-maxima.el),
>
> I suggest replacing batchload with batch(), and changing line 73 from
> "gnuplot_close ()$" to "gnuplot_close ()$ \nquit();"
>
> The difference between "batch" and "batchload" is that "batch" can
> process :lisp expressions in addition to maxima's own, and it prints
> input/output labels. However, it is possible to customise label printing
> from maxima's own code, and being able to evaluate :lisp just seems
> uncontrovercially good.
>
> It might be that I am missing something, but batch seems a better fit
> for Org-Babel.
Hello,
I think that your request may be handled by one of two improvements:
1. Implement session support in ob-maxima.el; and
2. Many of the design decisions in the existing ob-maxima code should be
customizable.
I am attaching a patch to address 2. Please try it out, I think that it
will satisfy your requests. Feedback is welcome.
---
This old thread may also be relevant:
https://list.orgmode.org/87o7q5rw62.fsf@t14.reltub.ca/
Best,
Leo
0001-On-ltb-ob-max-ob-maxima.el-add-customizations.patch
Description: 0001-On-ltb-ob-max-ob-maxima.el-add-customizations.patch
- [BUG] Consider replacing bachload with batch in ob-maxima. [9.6.6 (release_9.6.6 @ /usr/share/emacs/30.0.50/lisp/org/)], Lockywolf, 2023/09/01
- Re: [BUG] Consider replacing bachload with batch in ob-maxima. [9.6.6 (release_9.6.6 @ /usr/share/emacs/30.0.50/lisp/org/)],
Leo Butler <=
- Re: [BUG] Consider replacing bachload with batch in ob-maxima. [9.6.6 (release_9.6.6 @ /usr/share/emacs/30.0.50/lisp/org/)], Ihor Radchenko, 2023/09/02
- Re: [BUG] Consider replacing bachload with batch in ob-maxima. [9.6.6 (release_9.6.6 @ /usr/share/emacs/30.0.50/lisp/org/)], Leo Butler, 2023/09/02
- [MAINTENANCE] On how much we can expose internals into defcustom (was: [BUG] Consider replacing bachload with batch in ob-maxima. [9.6.6 (release_9.6.6 @ /usr/share/emacs/30.0.50/lisp/org/)]), Ihor Radchenko, 2023/09/05
- Re: [MAINTENANCE] On how much we can expose internals into defcustom, Leo Butler, 2023/09/06
- Re: [MAINTENANCE] On how much we can expose internals into defcustom, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/09/07
- [PATCH] ob-maxima.el, etc. (was Re: [MAINTENANCE] On how much we can expose internals into defcustom), Leo Butler, 2023/09/12
- Re: [PATCH] ob-maxima.el, etc. (was Re: [MAINTENANCE] On how much we can expose internals into defcustom), Ihor Radchenko, 2023/09/15
- Re: [PATCH] ob-maxima.el, etc. (was Re: [MAINTENANCE] On how much we can expose internals into defcustom), Leo Butler, 2023/09/15
- Re: [PATCH] ob-maxima.el, etc. (was Re: [MAINTENANCE] On how much we can expose internals into defcustom), Ihor Radchenko, 2023/09/16
- Re: [PATCH] ob-maxima.el, etc. (was Re: [MAINTENANCE] On how much we can expose internals into defcustom), Leo Butler, 2023/09/19