Re: Completion of links to man pages

[Ihor Radchenko]

Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> writes:

> On 05/10/2023 19:48, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>> Max Nikulin writes:
>> 
>>> Frankly speaking, I am unsure if woman should be supported in Org at
>>> all. My early experience with woman.el was not nice. I tried M-x woman
>>> RET ssh RET (openssh).
>> 
>> woman is not trying to be complete. See [[info:woman#Introduction]].
>> 
>> For Org support, we already support it, and it would be a feature
>> regression if we remove it.
>
> World has changed since woman.el was developed. Are there systems with 
> man pages available, but no man command nowadays? Android with man pages 
> copied by its user?

MS-DOS, for example. Or old Windows versions. Emacs can work on many
systems and there is no reason to avoid supporting more OSes when we do
not have to.

> I see a little value in a tool that can not handle a wide spread case 
> when a better one is available. Features, that were unique for woman, 
> have been implemented for man.

Which is why `org-man-command' is set to 'man by default.

> In WoMan I have not found a way to open <man:man(7)> directly without an 
> additional prompt for the page section.

> man.el has a lot of options how to select window for a man page. It is 
> not the case for woman.
> ... For Org internal link types same/other window is 
> controlled by prefix argument (however `org-open-at-point' doc string 
> describes another meaning of prefix argument: if link should be opened 
> in Emacs or an external application). I am unsure what is proper 
> behavior of man links opened from Org, should Org try to make behavior 
> consistent or it should let packages to act as they wish.

These two sound like feature requests for WoMan. These features might also
benefit Org, if implemented.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>