[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Inconsistent text markup handling when double-nesting markers
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: Inconsistent text markup handling when double-nesting markers |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Oct 2023 09:15:35 +0000 |
Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> writes:
> Isn't nested bold for "**bold**" a bug? Generally it is not allowed and
>
> *b1 *b2* b3*
>
> is parsed as bold only for "b1 *b2".
No, **bold** it is not a bug. The parser is recursive with inner markup
not "seeing" its parent. So, we first parse the outer bold and then
continue parsing the contents separately, as *bold*.
Be it another way, /*bold italic*/ would also not be allowed as
we demand bol, whitespace, -, (, {, ', or " before the markup:
https://orgmode.org/worg/org-syntax.html#Emphasis_Markers
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
- Inconsistent text markup handling when double-nesting markers, Tom Alexander, 2023/10/09
- Re: Inconsistent text markup handling when double-nesting markers, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/10/10
- Re: Inconsistent text markup handling when double-nesting markers, Max Nikulin, 2023/10/10
- Re: Inconsistent text markup handling when double-nesting markers,
Ihor Radchenko <=
- Re: Inconsistent text markup handling when double-nesting markers, Max Nikulin, 2023/10/11
- Re: Inconsistent text markup handling when double-nesting markers, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/10/11
- Re: Inconsistent text markup handling when double-nesting markers, Tom Alexander, 2023/10/11
- Re: Inconsistent text markup handling when double-nesting markers, Max Nikulin, 2023/10/12
- Re: Inconsistent text markup handling when double-nesting markers, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/10/12