|
From: | Karl Fogel |
Subject: | Re: [FR] A more general case than footnotes |
Date: | Fri, 03 Nov 2023 10:02:20 -0500 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
On 02 Nov 2023, Suhail Singh wrote:
Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com> writes:My original announcement post from a year ago [2] is a good place to get a quickoverview of how oref.el works. ...[2] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-humanities/2022-10/msg00009.htmlFrom [2]: Thus, in "jones-interview.org" you might have this:Blah blah blah and then she said that the rockets had reached speedsof .3c in testing scenarios on a few occasions. [ref:1c3a90a9]Is it intended to be [ref:1c3a90a9] or is it supposed to be [[ref:1c3a90a9]] (i.e., a regular link without description)?
The former: [ref:1c3a90a9]oref.el isn't specific to Org Mode -- it's for use with any text-based format. In fact, our company's typical usage involves references that cross between text files of different formats: e.g., LaTeX <--> Markdown, Org <--> DocBook Lite XML, etc.
Now, "[[ref:1c3a90a9]]" contains "[ref:1c3a90a9]" of course, so in an Org Mode file one could format oref origin links as regular Org Mode links without descriptions. But personally I find that I'm never doing that -- I just put "[ref:1c3a90a9]".
On a related note, how are the references exported?
There is no provision for exporting. That's an Org Mode concept, but not an oref.el concept.
Best regards, -Karl
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |