Re: bash source code block: problem after ssh commands

[Max Nikulin]

On 22/11/2023 02:01, Bruno Barbier wrote:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
> > __By default__, Org should produce more expected behavior - what users
> > would get from running a script file rather than from redirecting stdin.
> > We can optionally leave the stdin redirection as an option to be used by
> > the users who understand the peculiarities.
>
> I agree that it would be simpler to switch to the script-like behavior
> by default on org side.  About the interactive-like behavior, that
> would be nice to keep it, if some people rely on it in their existing
> documents (I personally don't).

I do not like recommendations

    curl https://... | sudo bash

but I regularly see them. So some users might expect behavior like 
namely stdin, not like interactive prompt commands.

Perhaps even sessions may be switched to creation of a temporary file 
and executing "source tmpfile.sh". However it may be shell-specific (posh?).

Likely it is possible to implement a header argument to explicitly 
control whether `process-file' should be used or the block should be 
executed as a temporary script file. Currently it is implicitly 
determined from other header arguments.

P.S.

https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/089
"I'm reading a file line by line and running ssh or ffmpeg, only the 
first line gets processed!"

A similar case, but only data is read from stdin, script is a regular 
file, no difference bash vs. dash.