[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: redundant DOC files
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: redundant DOC files |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:08:05 +0200 |
> From: Leo <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 15:15:46 +0000
>
> On 2007-01-20, Eli Zaretskii said:
>
> >> The point is if I have 50 builds then the DOC-* will take up more
> >> than 100M disk space.
> >
> > Whoever cares about 100MB of disk space these days? ;-)
> >
> > And 50 builds give you 600MB worth of Emacs binaries (which you
> > never mentioned in your message), so adding 100MB more to that is
> > hardly a major issue, is it?
>
> I am thinking about packaging Emacs. Those DOC-files will make my
> emacs package much bigger.
You are probably packaging only a single version, so you should only
package a single DOC file, the one that goes with the binary you are
packaging.
If you include in the package emacs-XX.YY.ZZ as well as emacs, you
should do the same with DOC.
Re: redundant DOC files, Stefan Monnier, 2007/01/21
Re: redundant DOC files, Miles Bader, 2007/01/21