honorifics in talk intro?

[Sacha Chua]

Corwin Brust <corwin@bru.st> writes:

> Three tracks sounds fine to me.  I also like the idea of deferring to
> people's preferences regarding honorifics but suggesting our own
> "defaults".  For example, we could say something like:
> We will usually introduce you by your first name (or handle, if you
> prefer to go by a pseudonym) but if you'd rather be introduced
> differently (for example honorific followed by last-name, or whatever
> you prefer) just let us know.

Okay! We can include something like this when we send out draft intros
for the speakers to review.

Sacha