-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Lorenzo!
Lorenzo Isella wrote:
There is a fundamental problem with this approach: once a monomer is
surrounded by other monomers, it should feel a different noise due to
the screening by its neighbors, but this effect is not accounted for
in Espresso. I refer to the case in which there is no shear, just
Brownian motion.
Nobody knows exactly what it should feel, but it would be (at least
for me) wonderful to have a feature in Espresso that allows me, while
keeping the overall system temperature around T, to have the noise on each
monomer in an aggregate expressed as a function of e.g. the number of
first neighbors of that monomer.
The Langevin thermostat has been constructed as is to model the
statistical NVT ensemble, while still being very simple.
I think that if you would modify the Langevin thermostat in that way
without exactly knowing what you're doing, you would mess up this
statistical ensemble that your simulation lives in, and I wouldn't
expect that any of the effects that you might see in such a simulation
has any resemblance to what happens in nature.
As for whether there might be useful alternatives for you, I think that
others on this list have a better founded opinion on this matter.
Olaf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFI0PkstQ3riQ3oo/oRAn4XAKC48hivq1hClOZPfwhvy8jfOG1v7wCeJElD
lUFUePZDMKtouByO8rTqUKw=
=rqLD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
ESPResSo mailing list
address@hidden
https://fias.uni-frankfurt.de/mailman/listinfo/espresso