Re: [femlisp-user] femlisp documentation 0.6 does not match femlisp 0.9.9?

[Nicolas Neuss]

Zach <address@hidden> writes:

> Hello out there,
>
> I pulled the newest Femlisp from CVS (either 0.9.9 or 0.9.10, the VERSION
> and CHANGES files seem to contradict each other).  When I tried the the
> examples in the manual most of them did not work.  In fact it appears
> that they seem to be made for a different interface, like in the heat
> equation example (and several others) there are calls to
> `constant-coefficient' with only one argument.  According to describe you
> must provide a name and a value.
>
> So, anyway, I wanted to confirm that there is something wrong here,
> right?  And are there any plans to fix this?
>
> Zach

Yes, part of the interface in the CVS version has changed.  It really is
time for a new release which I have postponed due to other tasks.  I'll try
to do it ASAP, hopefully still this week, and will report it on this list.

Yours, Nicolas