[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fenfire-dev] non-profit association vs. co-operative
From: |
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho |
Subject: |
Re: [Fenfire-dev] non-profit association vs. co-operative |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:26:29 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On 20040611T001946+0300, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
> | Certain "IRS"-cerified charities can take donations that are
> | tax-deductible to the donor.
>
> That's the part I was interested in. I guess that the qualification is
> the same you talk about below with regard to the association paying
> taxes on donations it receives (the association must be "charitable")?
Actually, no. The requirements for this are more stringent and
the association needs to get itself on an "IRS"-maintained
list.
To get on that list, the association's purpose needs to be preservation
of Finnish cultural heritage or the support of science or art. I doubt
a Fenfire association would qualify.
> | 1) Its sole motivation on all its operations is direct common good
> | materially, spiritually ("henkisessä mielessä"), educationally
> | ("siveellisessä mielessä") or socially ("yhteiskunnallisessa
> | mielessä"). [Translations are rough where the original phrase is
> | indicated.]
>
> Which one would we fit into here?
All of them. Of course, the stated purpose of the organization needs to
be a little more broad than just "production of Fenfire". Compare to
SPI, which is Debian's legal arm, but it's stated purpose is something
like advancement of free software ideology :) Production of
Fenfire/Debian is just the chosen means to that end.
> | 2) Its activities are not limited to a particular set of people.
> | (This means, for example, that membership must be open to anybody
> | who agrees with the goals, not only to for example people called
> | Kaijanaho:)
>
> Do we have any way to kick out or reject membership applications from
> people who we feel are damaging to the project? I.e., can we assure that
> the association isn't taken over by people who want to do something very
> different with it? (Maybe '...who agrees with the goals' can help here?)
Sure. It's a standard part of any association's bylaws and I have
never heard that being a problem. Of course, if it can be shown in
court that the association is systematically rejecting applications by,
say, all non-Kaijanaho people...
--
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.info/
Päiväkohtaisia kirjoituksia - http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.info/blog/
Toys - http://www.cc.jyu.fi/yhd/toys/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature