[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fenfire-dev] Yet another libvob API: LWJGL
From: |
Benja Fallenstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Fenfire-dev] Yet another libvob API: LWJGL |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:55:56 +0200 |
On 1/13/06, Tuukka Hastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> So what's this difference between the possibilities of Tuomas's design and
> Java binding libraries?
Tuomas' design does the animation in C++ code. So the Java code passes
the vobscene to the C++ side through JNI, as well as the interpolation
list, but this is only once for every animation *sequence*; then it
only says, 'render this frame,' and the C++ code does all the
interpolation with the appropriate GL calls.
> I would say in blind that we build a string or an
> array of calls to make and send them as a parameter in one JNI call.
That's not what we currently do. I have no idea whether that's what
the bindings libraries do :-)
I also don't know whether string interpretation on the C side would be
fast enough. (Parsing in general is slow, I understand.) Yes, we've
used strings before, but my understanding is that we passed them
through one time when a vob class was initialized, interpreted them
this one time, and then used a more efficient representation for
actual rendering (call list, I s'pose).
Perhaps Matti can chime in with details?
- Benja
- [Fenfire-dev] Yet another libvob API: LWJGL, Matti Katila, 2006/01/11
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] Yet another libvob API: LWJGL, Tuukka Hastrup, 2006/01/11
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] Yet another libvob API: LWJGL, Matti Katila, 2006/01/14
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] Yet another libvob API: LWJGL, Tuukka Hastrup, 2006/01/14
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] Yet another libvob API: LWJGL, Matti Katila, 2006/01/15
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] Yet another libvob API: LWJGL, Benja Fallenstein, 2006/01/15
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] Yet another libvob API: LWJGL, Tuukka Hastrup, 2006/01/16
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] Yet another libvob API: LWJGL, Benja Fallenstein, 2006/01/16
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] Yet another libvob API: LWJGL, Tuukka Hastrup, 2006/01/17
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] Yet another libvob API: LWJGL, Benja Fallenstein, 2006/01/17
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] Yet another libvob API: LWJGL, Matti Katila, 2006/01/17
Re: [Fenfire-dev] Yet another libvob API: LWJGL, Benja Fallenstein, 2006/01/11