[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Findutils-patches] patch for 20751 memory corruption in -ls
From: |
James Youngman |
Subject: |
Re: [Findutils-patches] patch for 20751 memory corruption in -ls |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Aug 2007 09:09:32 +0100 |
On 8/11/07, Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> OK to apply, to both branch and head?
Yes, both.
> The testsuite doesn't exercise -ls,
> because it is timestamp dependent. Maybe we should rethink that, and come
> up with a way to do an -ls test.
Yes, and also with other timestamp tests.
> By the way, the THANKS file could
> probably use a good cleanup; there have been more people contributing via
> savannah than what THANKS listed (I omitted the THANKS patch so that I'm
> not posting raw email addressed of random contributers in the past).
Hmm. If I apply a patch I generally put the person's name in either
THANKS (for small changes) or AUTHORS (for large ones). Perhaps I
have been less than thorough in doing this.
James.