findutils-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Findutils-patches] patch for 20751 memory corruption in -ls


From: James Youngman
Subject: Re: [Findutils-patches] patch for 20751 memory corruption in -ls
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 09:09:32 +0100

On 8/11/07, Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> OK to apply, to both branch and head?

Yes, both.

> The testsuite doesn't exercise -ls,
> because it is timestamp dependent.  Maybe we should rethink that, and come
> up with a way to do an -ls test.

Yes, and also with other timestamp tests.

> By the way, the THANKS file could
> probably use a good cleanup; there have been more people contributing via
> savannah than what THANKS listed (I omitted the THANKS patch so that I'm
> not posting raw email addressed of random contributers in the past).

Hmm.   If I apply a patch I generally put the person's name in either
THANKS (for small changes) or AUTHORS (for large ones).   Perhaps I
have been less than thorough in doing this.

James.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]