Re: [fluid-dev] I removed GLIB dependency from my build.

[Marcus Weseloh]

Hi all,

Just a quick thought: would moving to another libc that supports the necessary C11 extensions be a possibility? I've read that musl has C11 support, including the threading extensions.

Not sure how big the repercussions would be for the Linux and Mac OS ports, 

Am 10.10.2017 19:32 schrieb "Tom M." <address@hidden>:

Without having seen your changes, you have probably done something like what existed before glib:
https://github.com/FluidSynth/fluidsynth/blob/b49458e817ed09aedd948a6ea1831965373adc80/fluidsynth/src/fluid_sys.h#L142

This is not an option because it's unmaintainable. See the related discussion here for possible solutions:

http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/fluid-dev/2017-09/msg00031.html

Tom

2017-10-10 18:57 GMT+02:00 Carlo Bramini <address@hidden>:

Hello,
as I wrote in the subject, I worked a bit on Fluidsynth and I made a version that works fine without external dependencies. I compiled it on the ancient VisualStudio 6.0 and my version currentl runs on Windows.
However, it should not be difficult to include a new driver for adding again support to GLIB at compile time or to add support for other platforms, especially direct pthreads support.
I'm wondering if you would be interested to evaluate these changes and how to do it if it could be possible to add them to the original source code.
I have still some work to do on it, because some functions are still not implemented and my coding started almost from version 1.1.7 (I cloned the repository a bit before the release of the latest stable) but in the meanwhile new patches have been submitted, so I should also align my code at latest revision.

Sincerely.

_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev

_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev