[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Freebangfont-devel] latin glyphs (was Re: Realization after ...)
From: |
Sayamindu Dasgupta |
Subject: |
Re: [Freebangfont-devel] latin glyphs (was Re: Realization after ...) |
Date: |
Sat, 3 May 2003 19:54:05 +0530 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
On Friday 02 May 2003 1:44 am, Deepayan Sarkar said in public:
> > > For the screenshot (and this has nothing to do with the problem at
> > > hand), could you try removing Likhan and try again ? The english glyphs
> > > being used are the crappy Likhan ones, which makes no sense.
> >
> > Ok, Sagar has no Latin glyphs - will be adding some.
>
> This was something I meant to bring up for discussion. Do we really want to
> have latin glyphs for all our fonts ? Except for the size thing, that seems
> kind of stupid, since (at least on Linux) the fallback mechanism works
> quite well. Why waste effort on something other people are doing better ?
I understand your point. However, I don't know how the fallback mechanism
works. What if it chooses some, say decorative or crappy English font as the
default fallback for applications. That can be a major source of trouble and
galigalaj.
-sayamindu-
--
:
####[ GNU/Linux One Stanza Tip (LOST) ]#######################
Sub : File/ dir permissions LOST #019
Value Permission Directory Listing
0 No read, no write, no execute ---
1 No read, no write, execute --x
2 No read, write, no execute -w-
3 No read, write, execute -wx
4 Read, no write, no execute r--
5 Read, no write, execute r-x
6 Read, write, no execute rw-
7 Read, write, execute rwx
####<address@hidden>###################################
: