freebangfont-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Freebangfont-devel] Re: [Issue N22662] more bengali rendering bug


From: Deepayan Sarkar
Subject: Re: [Freebangfont-devel] Re: [Issue N22662] more bengali rendering bugs in Qt 3.2 beta
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 04:31:27 -0500 (CDT)

Hi,

many thanks again for your efforts. I'm currently on holiday myself, which
is why it took me so long to respond. Everything seems to be working fine,
I'll let you know if I discover any more problems.

Deepayan

On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 address@hidden wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> it took me a bit longer to fix these, as I was on holidays for some time
> in between. The attached version of qscriptengine_x11.cpp should fix
> all the problems you talked about. Please tell me if you discover any
> other/new problems.
> 
> Best regards,
> Lars
> 
> 
> On Monday, 02. Jun 2003 02:45 Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
> >
> > (Related to an earlier bug report: [Issue N22662])
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > here are some more Bengali rendering bugs in Qt 3.2 beta (Linux)
> > (the first one being the most serious):
> >
> >
> > (1) trying to render the combination
> >
> >       ra + hasanta +   ka + vowel-sign-o
> >
> >       09B0      09CD   0995           09CB
> >
> >     crashes Qt. In fact, the same is true for any consonant in place
> >     of
> >     'ka' (0995)
> >
> >
> >
> > (2) I mentioned this before, and it's more serious than I initially
> > thought.
> >
> >       ra + hasanta + consonant + hasanta + ba
> >
> >     is rendered incorrectly. The attached files have some real
> >     examples
> >
> >
> > (3) zo-phola: YA (09AF) becomes a post-base form only when it's placed
> >     after the base consonant in a syllable, not when it's
> >     standalone. Qt is rendering
> >
> >       ya + hasanta (09AF + 09CD)
> >
> >     as ya-phala (post-base form of ya). The 'halant' form should be
> >     used
> >     instead.
> >
> > (4) Init feature: Does Qt support the init feature ? From my tests it
> >     seems that it is using the initial form of e-kaar and ai-kaar
> >     (09C7 and 09C8) all the time, irrespective of whether it's at the
> >     beginning of a word. In the attached examples, the first case
> >     should
> >     be the init form but not the second.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Deepayan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Lars Knoll, Senior Software Engineer
> Trolltech AS, Waldemar Thranes gt. 98, N-0175 Oslo, Norway
> 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]