[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Freecats-Dev] Underlying Unix base
From: |
Yves Champollion |
Subject: |
Re: [Freecats-Dev] Underlying Unix base |
Date: |
Fri, 9 May 2003 13:06:57 +0200 |
> From: "Henri Chorand" <address@hidden>
> As stated by Murphy's laws [sometimes called in French: "Loi de
> l'emmerdement maximum"], I wonder how it comes up that one of the fastest
> CAT tools available is written with the slowest interpreted language
> available.
... and is the CAT with the least code of them all (590Kbytes zipped).
It's my love for paradoxes.
my last attempt to produce a CAT with C (+some native 386 assembly code) in
the mid-90's ended up producing such a slow performer, I threw the entire
code away. Go figure.
If Marc Prior reads this: can a Macro project in OO be protected (or can
anyone look at the code, as with MsOffice, well, you know, there's no real
protection there) ?
yves
- [Freecats-Dev] Heartsome's XLIFF Translation Editor, Henri Chorand, 2003/05/06
- [Freecats-Dev] Radio silence, Marc Prior, 2003/05/06
- Re: [Freecats-Dev] Radio silence, Yves Champollion, 2003/05/08
- [Freecats-Dev] Underlying Unix base, Henri Chorand, 2003/05/08
- Re: [Freecats-Dev] Underlying Unix base, Marc Prior, 2003/05/09
- RE: [Freecats-Dev] Underlying Unix base, Henri Chorand, 2003/05/09
- Re: [Freecats-Dev] Underlying Unix base,
Yves Champollion <=
- [Freecats-Dev] Wordfast/OOo, Marc Prior, 2003/05/09
- Re: [Freecats-Dev] Wordfast/OOo, Yves Champollion, 2003/05/09
- Re: [Freecats-Dev] Wordfast/OOo, Kirk McElhearn, 2003/05/09
- Re: [Freecats-Dev] Wordfast/OOo, Yves Champollion, 2003/05/09
- Re: [Freecats-Dev] Underlying Unix base, Marc Prior, 2003/05/09
- Re: [Freecats-Dev] Underlying Unix base, Kirk McElhearn, 2003/05/09
- [Freecats-Dev] Softmaker - Textmaker, Henri Chorand, 2003/05/09
- [Freecats-Dev] NO MORE Radio silence :-)), Henri Chorand, 2003/05/08