[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Freeipmi-devel] future one source tree package naming
|
From: |
Ian Zimmerman |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Freeipmi-devel] future one source tree package naming |
|
Date: |
13 Apr 2004 17:33:19 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
Ian> I like this best. Simplicity rules. The library package should be
Ian> split into runtime & devel.
Albert> But you just said simplicity rules?? :-) Fewer packages the
Albert> better?? That's my take, but I can understand why others want a
Albert> devel.
That is per Debian policy, and I think it's the general rule on Red Hat
too even if they don't have a policy.