freeipmi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Freeipmi-devel] about FISH


From: Sun, Ning
Subject: [Freeipmi-devel] about FISH
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:31:00 +0800

 
Hi, 
In reading FISH source codes,  I am puzzled by the commands like
"eval","load","toggle","pon","poff" in file interpreter.c.

Can anyone help me explain the commands' semantic?

A step further, is there a document describing the FISH design and
implementation?

Thanks very much in advance!

Ning Sun


 


-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf
Of address@hidden
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 12:04 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Freeipmi-devel Digest, Vol 8, Issue 3

Send Freeipmi-devel mailing list submissions to
        address@hidden

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        address@hidden

You can reach the person managing the list at
        address@hidden

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of Freeipmi-devel digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: sensors ok vs. alert (Anand Babu)
   2. Re: about IPMI Power (ipmipower): (Anand Babu)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 13:47:01 -0700
From: Anand Babu <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-devel] sensors ok vs. alert
To: address@hidden
Cc: address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi Robin,
I will take the responsibility to work with Intel to get a new SDR
update. 

-- Anand Babu


,----[ address@hidden ]
| I agree with AB that if these sensor values are actually "ok" then 
| Intel ought to change the nominal min/max values to reflect this.
| When we first set up our host monitoring software on thunder, I 
| noticed a large number of sensor values out of range and tried to get 
| Bryan Rice from Intel to investigate but I never succeed in getting 
| him onto our system.
| 
| AB, would you please go through CDC's channels with Intel to open a 
| problem report on this and get a determination from Intel as to 
| whether these sensor readings are really ok or if they indicate a real

| hardware problem?  If the former, then I wold like them to change 
| their nominal limits.  If the latter, then we will want CDC or Intel 
| to assist us with identifying and replacing the affected hardware 
| components, since this affects nearly half of thunder.
`----

> 
> ,----[ Albert Chu <address@hidden> ]
> | Hey AB,
> | 
> | We've noticed on a thunder that as many as 50% of nodes are showings

> | alerts for voltage sensors.  I don't believe this is bad, b/c the 
> | voltages are within the lower and upper critical range.  However, 
> | since fish/sensors uses the normal min/max range, many sensors are 
> | showing alerts (IMHO) more often than is appropriate.
> | 
> | I'm in discussion with the admins about their preference for output 
> | of ranges and alerts, but I think something should be changed in 
> | fish/sensors.  If I understand this correctly, we can use the 
> | readable threshold mask (field 20 of the full sensor data record) to

> | determine which ranges are available.
> | 
> | I'm going to add a feature request on this to FreeIPMI so we don't 
> | forget.
> | 
> | Al
> `----
> Hi Al,
> How about, Intel increasing the nominal min/max if they believe that 
> the condition is normal.
> 
> Otherwise, I will work with Bala and come up with a good alerting 
> policy for sensors tool.
> 
> I think,
>   crossing nominal  min/max limits should still be ALERT and 
>   crossing critical min/max limits as CRITICAL.
> 
> I will take a look at threshold mask too.
> 
> --
> Anand Babu
> Free as in Freedom <www.gnu.org>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freeipmi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
> 


--
Anand Babu
Free as in Freedom <www.gnu.org>




------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 00:51:47 -0700
From: Anand Babu <address@hidden>
Subject: [Freeipmi-devel] Re: about IPMI Power (ipmipower):
To: "Sun, Ning" <address@hidden>
Cc: freeipmi-devel <address@hidden>
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

,----[ "Sun, Ning" <address@hidden> ]
| Are there IPMI Power (ipmipower) source code?
| 
| if yes, where can I find it?
| 
| Thanks,
| 
| Ning Sun
`----

It is part of current CVS tree and will be available from Aplha-6
onwards. Albert Chu is currently maintaining "ipmipower", You may be
able to get separate source tarballs for previous releases directly
from him.

If not, there is also an UNMAINTAINED old version at 
ftp://ftp.californiadigital.com/pub/freeipmi/ipmipower-0.1.2.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.californiadigital.com/pub/freeipmi/libcdcipmi-0.1.1.tar.gz

-- 
Anand Babu
Free as in Freedom <www.gnu.org>




------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Freeipmi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel


End of Freeipmi-devel Digest, Vol 8, Issue 3
********************************************





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]