freeipmi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Freeipmi-devel] configure: warning while processing for powerpc / O


From: Dick.Detweiler
Subject: RE: [Freeipmi-devel] configure: warning while processing for powerpc / Open embedded target
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 14:40:34 +0000

I'm going to be lazy here...

Our cross-compile environment has io.h in asm/io.h.  However, something must be 
defining HAVE_SYS_IO_H because that's what ipmi-kcs-driver.c ends up trying to 
include.  Where are HAVE_[SYS/ASM]_IO_H determined and is there something I can 
do for a quick and dirty fix?

Thanks again,
Dick

-----Original Message-----
From: Albert Chu [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 5:53 PM
To: Detweiler, Dick [NETPWR/AVOCENT/AL]
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-devel] configure: warning while processing for powerpc / 
Open embedded target

Hey Dick,

Personally, I've never seen this before.  I don't use bitbake so I don't
know much about it.  But from the output, I'd guess that your bitmake
build environment is missing some headers.  I think what it's saying is
if you have:

/usr/include/example.h

#include <foo.h>

mycode.c:

#include <example.h>

autoconf is only checking for example.h, but because foo.h doesn't
exist, it can't compile.  Just a guess, hope it helps.

Al

On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 11:22 -0700, address@hidden wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
>  
> 
> Running configure via bitbake and autoconf tool sets.  They generated
> the following warning:
> 
>  
> 
> configure: WARNING: sys/io.h: present but cannot be compiled
> 
> configure: WARNING: sys/io.h:     check for missing prerequisite
> headers?
> 
> configure: WARNING: sys/io.h: see the Autoconf documentation
> 
> configure: WARNING: sys/io.h:     section "Present But Cannot Be
> Compiled"
> 
> configure: WARNING: sys/io.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's
> result
> 
> configure: WARNING: sys/io.h: in the future, the compiler will take
> precedence
> 
> configure: WARNING:     ## ------------------------------------- ##
> 
> configure: WARNING:     ## Report this to address@hidden ##
> 
> configure: WARNING:     ## ------------------------------------- ##
> 
>  
> 
> So I’ve now reported.  What is the implication to this warning?
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>  
> 
> Dick Detweiler |Senior Software Engineer, MSD | Avocent | USA
> 
> Emerson Network Power | 4991 Corporate Drive | Huntsville, AL
> 35805-6201
> 
> T 256.261.6550 | F 256.430.4027
> 
> www.*avocent.com
> 
> www.*emersonnetworkpower.com
> 
>  
> 
> 
-- 
Albert Chu
address@hidden
Computer Scientist
High Performance Systems Division
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]