[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] Inverted IPMI responses

Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-devel] Inverted IPMI responses
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:01:03 +0000

Hi Albert

Session sequence numbers looks correct.

Kind regards / Cordialement

Marc Girard
Power Efficiency team

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden <address@hidden> On Behalf Of Albert Chu
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 4:59 PM
To: GIRARD, MARC <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-devel] Inverted IPMI responses

Hi Marc,

It's certainly possible it's a implementation bug.  It's also possibly a 
network routing race where the packets race.  Could you show the full 
headers/trailers of the packets, I would like to see the session sequence 


On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:58 AM GIRARD, MARC <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi FreeIPMI Team,
> We experiment a unusual problem with Intel PCSD S2600BPB host.
> With Intel Node Manager OEM command, sometime response messages come in 
> reverse order : OEM Intelnm Get Node Manager Statistics Response first then 
> Send Message Response.
> See side by side trace analysis in .pdf joined
> With my knowledge of the IPMI protocol, this is not allowed and I suspect a 
> BMC implementation bug.
> Can you give me your opinion?
> Kind regards / Cordialement
> Marc Girard
> Power Efficiency team - Atos
> address@hidden
> c6b7c7412cbb730e70b0198d5a%7C0%7C0%7C636832511564980186&amp;sdata=aEZc
> ItBQyxHnFSssND0gPa2ERqiEU7Upf%2Bdoiqnlras%3D&amp;reserved=0
> _______________________________________________
> Freeipmi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> 412cbb730e70b0198d5a%7C0%7C0%7C636832511564980186&amp;sdata=DmcRkkGnJV
> Yx5HRYyxNavwyUbtV6rvEVrXJ3WH23%2Bz4%3D&amp;reserved=0

Attachment: stderr_ko
Description: stderr_ko

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]