|
From: | Laurent Julliard |
Subject: | [FR-devel] RE: Backend Debouch |
Date: | Wed, 28 Aug 2002 16:35:14 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 |
Curt Hibbs wrote:
While I personally believe that the SWT approach is really the correct one for the long term, it really is a very large effort and would require a significant team of Ruby developers (or at least three of you, Tom :-). A more practical solution is back where you started -- a wxWindows binding to Ruby -- because wxWindows does provide all of the essential features, and is a mature GUI library. In retrospect, I think it would make more sense if I contact Bob Calco and see where he is with the wxWindows binding and either join forces with him, or take it over.
Sometimes I wonder if we Curt and I have cloned brains. I just posted a message in another thread which basically says the exact same thing :-)
Laurent -- Laurent JULLIARD - Xerox R&T/SSTC/XPA - Open Source team >> Host your Xerox Software project on CodeX: http://codex.xerox.com >> address@hidden community: http://xww.linux.world.xerox.com
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |