[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [FR-devel] freeride and the thread fix
From: |
Rich Kilmer |
Subject: |
RE: [FR-devel] freeride and the thread fix |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 01:08:57 -0400 |
We could do such a thing. I couple of months ago a fella in Japan wrote
a comprehensive patch that would use CreateProcess to simulate fork.
The patch was never accepted...
We should be able to call CreateProcess though.
Trying to fix the databus inspector now...
-rich
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On
> Behalf Of Hal E. Fulton
> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 1:13 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [FR-devel] freeride and the thread fix
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rich Kilmer" <address@hidden>
> To: "FreeRIDE" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:47 PM
> Subject: [FR-devel] freeride and the thread fix
>
>
> > Now...if I try and open the debugger I get an exception
> that fork() is
> > not supported on Win32. We will need an alternate method
> of starting
> > a process. On win32 although you cannot do popen3 you can
> do IO.popen
> > (but can then only capture stdout :-(.
>
> Hmm... I'm pretty ignorant of the Windows
> stuff, but I've been wondering how hard it
> would be to make a "fake" fork() using
> CreateProcess or something. We have WIN32OLE
> (not to mention WIN32API) at our disposal.
> And Ruby/DL I guess.
>
> Hal
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeride-devel mailing list address@hidden
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/freeride-devel
>
>
Re: [FR-devel] freeride and the thread fix, Laurent Julliard, 2002/08/30