[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: failing fonts
From: |
James H. Cloos Jr. |
Subject: |
Re: failing fonts |
Date: |
09 Jul 2000 17:00:22 -0500 |
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Kacvinsky <address@hidden> writes:
Tom> [mminstance] simply comments them out. I haven't checked
Tom> carefully, but if those modules don't parse out the comments,
Tom> they might be fooled into thinking the instance is an MM font
Tom> (which it isn't anymore).
Removing (but not just commenting out) those /Blue entries in /Private
and reassembling allows ftmulti to work. Commenting them out does not,
so it looks like comments are not being ignored.
(Tested to determine whether comments were being ignored, but mostly
just to see what the fonts looked like. :)
Also, if you compare those fonts with Adobe(Sans|Serif)MM, the former
have arrays for more /Blue stuff than the latter. May be relevant.
Or not.
-JimC
--
James H. Cloos, Jr. <http://jhcloos.com/public_key> 1024D/ED7DAEA6
<address@hidden> E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6
Is this post worth two cents? Then goto <http://2cw.org/23>!
- failing fonts, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/07/08
- Re: failing fonts, Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/07/08
- Re: failing fonts, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/07/08
- Re: failing fonts, Sivan Toledo, 2000/07/09
- Re: failing fonts, Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/07/09
- Re: failing fonts,
James H. Cloos Jr. <=
- type1z, comments, etc... [was: failing fonts], Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/07/10
- Re: type1z, comments, etc... [was: failing fonts], David Turner, 2000/07/10
Re: failing fonts, David Turner, 2000/07/10