[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Devel] Getting accurate advances
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Devel] Getting accurate advances |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Nov 2003 18:17:38 +0100 (CET) |
> > Since FT_Int64 can be either a structure or a data type we have to
> > provide some code in case TT_MULDIV really can't be used here to
> > avoid overflow.
>
> Then, I'm afraid, that code will have to be provided. (I don't quite
> feel up to this myself.)
I'm now using a new FT_MulDiv_No_Round function in the CVS to fix
that. Please test.
Werner
- Re: [Devel] Getting accurate advances, (continued)
- RE: [Devel] Getting accurate advances, Turner David, 2003/11/20
- RE: [Devel] Getting accurate advances, Turner David, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Devel] Getting accurate advances, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/11/21
- Re: [Devel] Getting accurate advances, Rogier van Dalen, 2003/11/22
- Re: [Devel] Getting accurate advances, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/11/23
- Re: [Devel] Getting accurate advances, Rogier van Dalen, 2003/11/24
- Re: [Devel] Getting accurate advances, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/11/24
- Re: [Devel] Getting accurate advances, Rogier van Dalen, 2003/11/24
- Re: [Devel] Getting accurate advances,
Werner LEMBERG <=