[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] WOFF2 support update and questions
From: |
Nikhil Ramakrishnan |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] WOFF2 support update and questions |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Jun 2019 19:48:12 +0530 |
> A single font from a TTC collection has no references to the TTC as a
> whole. So yes, you can completely hide the fact that you are
> processing a TTC.
Great, so I can load only the requested font.
> > Do these `individual' streams function identically to a full `TTC'
> > stream?
This was further clarification to my question, whether creating a
stream with only the requested face would have any difference from
creating a TTC stream. That part is clear to me now.
Another question: How do I access the requested `face index'?
`sfnt_open_font' does not have the information as a parameter, but its
caller (`sfnt_init_face' does have the requested index as
`face_instance_index').
--
Nikhil
- [ft-devel] WOFF2 support update and questions, Nikhil Ramakrishnan, 2019/06/16
- Re: [ft-devel] WOFF2 support update and questions, Nikolaus Waxweiler, 2019/06/16
- Re: [ft-devel] WOFF2 support update and questions, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/06/17
- Re: [ft-devel] WOFF2 support update and questions, Nikhil Ramakrishnan, 2019/06/18
- Re: [ft-devel] WOFF2 support update and questions, Nikhil Ramakrishnan, 2019/06/19
- Re: [ft-devel] WOFF2 support update and questions, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/06/21
- Re: [ft-devel] WOFF2 support update and questions,
Nikhil Ramakrishnan <=
- Re: [ft-devel] WOFF2 support update and questions, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/06/22
- Re: [ft-devel] WOFF2 support update and questions, Nikhil Ramakrishnan, 2019/06/23
- Re: [ft-devel] WOFF2 support update and questions, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/06/23
- Re: [ft-devel] WOFF2 support update and questions, Nikhil Ramakrishnan, 2019/06/27
- Re: [ft-devel] WOFF2 support update and questions, Werner LEMBERG, 2019/06/28
Re: [ft-devel] WOFF2 support update and questions, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2019/06/17