[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Uninitalized Face data
From: |
Just van Rossum |
Subject: |
Re: Uninitalized Face data |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Feb 2000 19:38:24 +0100 |
At 3:53 PM +0000 24-02-2000, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> This schema would be easier to understand if struct
>> TT_Instance_ was called _TT_Instance. The location of the
>> underscore is important as it's semantic is documented: underscored
>> symbols and type names are private and shall never be directly
>> referenced by library users (K&R, ANSI C).
>
>Hmm, we had this first, but for a reason I no longer know we have been
>advised (about two years ago) *not* to start with an underscore.
CVS reveals the secret, freetype.h, rev. 1.39:
"All _[A-Z].* identifiers changed to [A-Z].*_ for ANSI conformity."
Strange...
Just
- Uninitalized Face data, Arnar Mar Hrafnkelsson, 2000/02/23
- Re: Uninitalized Face data, Antoine Leca, 2000/02/24
- Re: Uninitalized Face data, Arnar Mar Hrafnkelsson, 2000/02/24
- Re: Uninitalized Face data, Bertrand Petit, 2000/02/24
- Re: Uninitalized Face data, Just van Rossum, 2000/02/24
- Re: Uninitalized Face data, Antoine Leca, 2000/02/24
- Re: Uninitalized Face data, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/02/24
- Re: Uninitalized Face data,
Just van Rossum <=
- Re: Uninitalized Face data, Stefan Seefeld, 2000/02/24
- Re: Uninitalized Face data, Antoine Leca, 2000/02/25
- Re: Uninitalized Face data, David Turner, 2000/02/25
Re: Uninitalized Face data, Pavel Kankovsky, 2000/02/24
Re: Uninitalized Face data, Antoine Leca, 2000/02/24
Re: Uninitalized Face data, David Turner, 2000/02/25