[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Freetype] Re: Arial ttf - bad rendering of some glyphs
From: |
Pedriana, Paul |
Subject: |
[Freetype] Re: Arial ttf - bad rendering of some glyphs |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jul 2001 12:10:34 -0700 |
>>Windows disables font
smoothing <14pt, so it's
>>hard to compare FreeType
with AA and Windows's
>>TT rasterizer generating
Black&White pixmaps.
I don't think it is doing this exactly so on
my machine. Here is a picture
of
Windows' Wordpad on my Windows 2000 machine with the letter 'z'
drawn in
Times Roman normal, bold, italic, and bold-italic at successive
integral
point sizes from 5-26.
The 5 and 6 point sizes are being
anti-aliased, 7-13 are not, and 14+ are.
When antialiasing is turned off,
none of the letters are anti-aliased.
Also, I don't see any missing diagonal in
these Zs, but maybe I don't
have it set
up properly to show this error.
Windows 2000 Times Roman with Antialiasing.png
Description: Binary data
- [Freetype] Re: Arial ttf - bad rendering of some glyphs,
Pedriana, Paul <=
- [Freetype] Re: Arial ttf - bad rendering of some glyphs, David Turner, 2001/07/12
- [Freetype] Re: [Render] Re: Arial ttf - bad rendering of some glyphs, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/07/12
- [Freetype] Re: [Render] Re: Arial ttf - bad rendering of some glyphs, David Turner, 2001/07/13
- [Freetype] PS Type1 vs. TrueType, Vadim Plessky, 2001/07/13
- [Freetype] Re: [Render] PS Type1 vs. TrueType, Francesco Zappa Nardelli, 2001/07/13
- [Freetype] Re: [Render] PS Type1 vs. TrueType, Vadim Plessky, 2001/07/13
- [Freetype] Re: [Render] PS Type1 vs. TrueType, David Turner, 2001/07/13
- Re: [Freetype] Re: [Render] PS Type1 vs. TrueType, Vadim Plessky, 2001/07/13
- [Freetype] Re: PS Type1 vs. TrueType, David Turner, 2001/07/13
- Re: [Freetype] Re: PS Type1 vs. TrueType, Vadim Plessky, 2001/07/13