[ft] FT_Pos clarification (Typo?)

[Ian Britten]

Hi all,
I'm wondering if there's a typo in the FT_Pos docs, at:
http://freetype.sourceforge.net/freetype2/docs/reference/ft2-basic_types.html#FT_Pos

It's described as a *32-bit* integer, but is typedef'd to be a *long*.
On LP64 systems (Like x64 Linux), a long is actually *64* bits - See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LP64#Specific_data_models

If it's really required to be 32-bit (ie: int32_t), I suspect problems
would have been reported before this.  As such, I suspect it's just a
typo in the docs (Which should probably be fixed ;) ).

Ian