[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft] diff Pixel height
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft] diff Pixel height |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:25:41 +0100 (CET) |
> bbox = [0 3 12 14]
>
> .......****.
> .....*******
> ....****..*.
> ...***...**.
> ..***.******
> ..**.*******
> .**..*...***
> .**......**.
> .***...****.
> .*********..
> ...*****....
>
> bbox = [0 2 10 14]
>
> .......**.
> ......***.
> .....****.
> ....******
> ...***.***
> ...**..***
> ..********
> ..********
> .***...**.
> .**....**.
> **.....**.
> ..........
>
> Where in in Set_Char_size i gave character size as 12. I thought i
> will be getting the height of 12 pixels irrespective of the
> character.
I wrote:
If you specify a glyph size of 10 pixels you can expect that it
(more or less) harmonizes with other fonts rendered at a size of 10
pixels. It is completely unrelated to the actual size of the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
glyphs.
What is unclear in this sentence?
> Also, dont know why am i getting just a empty row at the end of
> glyph "A" and one column for glyph "G" at the beginning?
If you are using anti-aliasing there might be some non-zero gray
values in this row or column. Otherwise, I need a complete example to
find out what's going on).
Werner
- Re: [ft] diff Pixel height, samaram s, 2010/02/01
- Re: [ft] diff Pixel height,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Message not available
- Re: [ft] diff Pixel height, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/02/16
- Re: [ft] diff Pixel height, samaram s, 2010/02/17
- Re: [ft] diff Pixel height, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/02/17
- Re: [ft] diff Pixel height, samaram s, 2010/02/18
- Re: [ft] diff Pixel height, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/02/18
- Re: [ft] diff Pixel height, samaram s, 2010/02/22
- Re: [ft] diff Pixel height, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/02/22
- Re: [ft] diff Pixel height, samaram s, 2010/02/22