[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft] Font rendering quality
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft] Font rendering quality |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:08:36 +0200 (CEST) |
> But the rendering behavior you're seeing is because of poor hints,
> in particular the hints for the curved vertical strokes, between
> 9-27.
I disagree. There aren't any `poor hints'. The font is simply
designed to be rasterized as B/W only in this very range, and indeed
it renders quite fine if you do so.
> The gasp table does indeed call for grid fitting at those sizes, ...
The gasp table also says that you should use B/W rendering for those
sizes.
As you've correctly mentioned, there are serious problems with the
`post' table, but the hints are OK.
Werner
- [ft] Font rendering quality, Tudor, Dacian, 2013/07/17
- Re: [ft] Font rendering quality, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/07/17
- Re: [ft] Font rendering quality, Wojciech Mamrak, 2013/07/17
- Re: [ft] Font rendering quality, Dave Arnold, 2013/07/17
- Re: [ft] Font rendering quality, Tudor, Dacian, 2013/07/18
- Re: [ft] Font rendering quality, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/07/18
- Re: [ft] Font rendering quality, jason campbell, 2013/07/18
- Re: [ft] Font rendering quality, Tudor, Dacian, 2013/07/18
- Re: [ft] Font rendering quality, jason campbell, 2013/07/18
- Re: [ft] Font rendering quality,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft] Font rendering quality, jason campbell, 2013/07/18
- Re: [ft] Font rendering quality, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/07/19
- Re: [ft] Font rendering quality, Tudor, Dacian, 2013/07/19
- Re: [ft] Font rendering quality, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/07/20
- Re: [ft] Font rendering quality, Tudor, Dacian, 2013/07/19
- Re: [ft] Font rendering quality, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/07/18