[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" gl
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" glyph |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Oct 2013 01:31:21 +0100 (CET) |
> Ah, I was mislead because the SRP0 instruction sets RP0 to point to
> point number 10, which is the 4th phantom point (the caron has 7
> points), and the 4th phantom point's Y co-ordinate is:
>
> (loader)->top_bearing + (loader)->bbox.yMax - (loader)->vadvance.
>
> I guessed that the top_bearing and vadvance were calculated
> incorrectly if the vmtx table wasn't present,
Yes, I suspect that.
> but on second thoughts, the more plausible hypothesis is that the
> phantom point used for hinting the outer glyph (#733) is
> (incorrectly??) not reset from the phantom point used for the inner
> component (#649).
This will be the next thing after checking my first suspicion.
Werner
- [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" glyph, Nigel Tao, 2013/10/29
- Re: [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" glyph, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/10/30
- Re: [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" glyph, Nigel Tao, 2013/10/30
- Re: [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" glyph, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/10/30
- Re: [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" glyph, Nigel Tao, 2013/10/30
- Re: [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" glyph, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/10/30
- Re: [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" glyph, Nigel Tao, 2013/10/30
- Re: [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" glyph,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" glyph, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/10/30