[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft] FT_FloorFix and FT_CeilFix
From: |
Wojciech Mamrak |
Subject: |
Re: [ft] FT_FloorFix and FT_CeilFix |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Sep 2015 02:18:55 +0200 |
Sure :-)
2015-06-20 6:49 GMT+02:00 Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>:
>
> Hello Wijciech!
>
>
> Sorry for the very late response :-)
>
>> FT_FloorFix does not round towards minus infinity and FT_CeilFix
>> towards plus infinity for fractional negative values. This is
>> inconsistent with expected semantics as well as the docs, according
>> to which these functions work as expected. The problem with the
>> docs is, that FT_RoundFix is semantically correct, yet the
>> description is incorrect w.r.t. to its semantics. Werner pointed me
>> out these are solitary (legacy?) functions not used in FT anywhere,
>> added back in 2001.
>>
>> Example for FT_FloorFix: http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/5f2b10846110c3d7
>
> I suggest fixing both the functions and the descriptions to do the
> right thing. It seems to me that they were never tested because they
> aren't used.
>
> Can you provide a patch?
>
>
> Werner
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [ft] FT_FloorFix and FT_CeilFix,
Wojciech Mamrak <=