|
From: | Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
Subject: | Re: [ft] FT_Load_Glyph() slow? |
Date: | Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:04:36 +1200 |
On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 23:39:56 +0000, Dryden, Thomas wrote: > ... surprised to find that FT_Load_Glyph() was taking 500ns. FT_Load_Glyph is where the glyph rendering takes place. Does that surprise you? This is why there needs to be a separate caching layer on top.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |