frunge-internal
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Frunge] OFL kippen?


From: Martin Roppelt
Subject: Re: [Frunge] OFL kippen?
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:48:47 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090319)

Martin Roppelt ſchrieb am 19.06.2009 14:20:
Dennis Heidsiek ſchrieb am 15.06.2009 14:04:
Martin Roppelt ſchrieb am 14.06.2009 07:15 Uhr:
Die GPL/FE erlaubt auch das Einbinden von .otf-Frunge-Schriften auf Webſiten mittels @font-face, richtig?

Ich denke ſchon. :)

Ich habe nochmal in ##fonts nachgefragt:

 nim-nim | Martineo: GPL + font exception allow distribution
 nim-nim | Martineo: @font-face is just a form of distribution
Martineo | ok(,) thanks
Martineo | was unsure in front of th(is) multitude of possibilities
 nim-nim | Martineo: the only thing that may be tricky is making sources for the 
font & the GPL text available
Martineo | ok damn it
Martineo | you could include them in the font :)
 nim-nim | Martineo: I suppose a comment in the CSS file pointing to an URL 
with those would be sufficient to satisfy even the most vehement GPL supporter
Martineo | ok :D
Martineo | this would also be possible without Font Exception i think?
 nim-nim | Martineo: without the font exception some people will say your whole 
HTML or CSS file is GPL-ed too
Martineo | hooray!
 nim-nim | Martineo: so that's only a bother i(f) you don't want other people 
to copy parts of it
 nim-nim | but really, you don't want to try that case
 nim-nim | Martineo: especially if you have binary objects such as pictures and 
flash files on your web site
Martineo | :)


Ich bin für eine Lizenſierung nur unter der GPL/FE. Widerſpruch?

Ich möchte nicht drängen, aber ich möchte die Frage langſam entſchieden haben. Ich bin nämlich nicht bereit die Mixtura unter die OFL zu ſtellen (obwohl ich mir gar nicht ſicher bin, ob das im Repo ſchon Gültigkeit erlangen würde).





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]