[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [fsfc-discuss] FSF Canada - Call for action.
From: |
Russell McOrmond |
Subject: |
Re: [fsfc-discuss] FSF Canada - Call for action. |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:29:01 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) |
David Henry wrote:
I'm sure no-one here thinks otherwise, and expect I am actually
over-clarifying the obvious to most of you. <pointing at elephant>
Pointing at an elephant isn't a bad idea, as we may not all be on the
same page.
What I'm hoping, and what I'd like to transfer the domain names
eventually to, is a Canadian equivalent of what I see with FSF Europe
http://www.fsfeurope.org/ and http://fsf.org.in/
These aren't a GNU project, which is a project that creates software,
but as you can see from the headlines in those sites does more policy
work to protect the rights and interests of those who are authoring
software. (Some of it lobbying, some of it participating in standards
bodies, some of it hosting education/conferences/etc).
If lobbying/etc can't be done with charitable status, then I believe
the right response is to simply move forward without charitable status
-- not limit the organization to only those activities that can be done
under charitable status. I know of many organizations that have their
budget divided into activities based on funding and charitable status
issues, so this shouldn't be seen as a problem (IE: Hopefully there
will be funding applications as well. This is Canada where the funding
of NGOs is done differently than the foundation model in the USA).
I think authoring software is interesting, but don't think we need a
foundation for that. And if we do, I don't think FSF is the right
acronym for that type of organization. I wouldn't be all that
interested personally in such an organization as I don't think we have
any shortage of resources for authoring FLOSS, but do have a major
shortage of resources for people protecting our rights to author and
choose FLOSS. I often feel very lonely here in Ottawa trying to talk to
politicians and bureaucrats with only a handful of colleagues.
EFF isn't a FLOSS association/group, so a Canadian form of EFF (Like
Online rights Canada http://onlinerights.ca/ and associated
groups/projects) wouldn't and couldn't do the job we need.
We have CLUE (I'm the policy coordinator there
http://www.cluecan.ca/policy ), but it is also not an FSF in Canada.
While the organizations will of course work closely, and possibly have
some people overlap, they wouldn't have the same message.
An FSF Canada that has similar campaigns as FSF USA needs to exist,
for the same reason that an FSF exists (and needs to exist) in the USA
even though there is also an EFF, Linux Foundation, Public Patent
Foundation, Software Freedom Law Center, and so-on.
Bouncing our ideas off the FSF people, before we actually start
anything, should be enough for now. This should not be particularly
hard to do.
I've written, but no replies yet. Preference is if someone from FSF
just joins the list and helps get us started.
Legally speaking, there is no particular restraint on what we do with
the domain.
Legally speaking, there is no particular restraint on what I (as
current owner) can do with the two domains. But practically speaking,
I'm only interested in personally hosting or transferring those domains
to an organization that is doing in Canada like what FSF Europe and FSF
India are doing in their respective regions/countries.
People can create whatever organizations they want, and while there
are limitations on some trademarked phrases, those organizations can
carry out any of the activities mentioned thus far in the mailing list.
There are many organization names where the acronyms aren't already
taken as domain names.
The fsf.ca and fsfc.ca domains are, however, spoken for ;-)
--
Russell McOrmond, Internet Consultant: <http://www.flora.ca/>
Please help us tell the Canadian Parliament to protect our property
rights as owners of Information Technology. Sign the petition!
http://www.digital-copyright.ca/petition/ict/
"The government, lobbied by legacy copyright holders and hardware
manufacturers, can pry my camcorder, computer, home theatre, or
portable media player from my cold dead hands!"
Re: [fsfc-discuss] FSF Canada - Call for action., Russell McOrmond, 2008/03/08