[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Fsfe-france] FSF France activity report
|
From: |
Loic Dachary |
|
Subject: |
[Fsfe-france] FSF France activity report |
|
Date: |
Wed, 22 Aug 2001 01:57:20 +0200 |
Hi,
The FSF France activity report for June-July-August has just been
published. You can read it at:
http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-08-20-01.en.html
FSF France activity report
The [1]FSF Europe presence in France exists since April 12 2001,
and produced an [2]activity report covering April and May 2001.
This report covers June, July and August 2001. If some subjects are
obscure, you can get back to the previous report to better
understand them. We took care to keep the same headlines to ease
cross reference.
During those three months we established many contacts, informally
or on actual actions, with Free Software organization or
individuals around the world. All of them were possible thanks to
APRIL (national), FSF (international) and FSF Europe (European).
Our actions can now extend to Portugal, Spain, Italy, United
Kingdom, Luxembourg, Sweden, Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland,
Denmark, South Africa, Japan, China, Hungaria, Czech Republic,
India, Korea, Mexico, United States and Canada.
We attended to events, the most important being [3]LSM and produced
a sustained advocacy effort coordinated with other organizations.
Actions previously engaged (Savannah, Savannah and Europe,
freedoms, GPL translation, GNU information, Technopole Logiciel
Libre) made significant progress. New actions were also started
(patents, education, science, electronic voting, press review, GNU
and Debian), most of them mainly undertaken by associate
organizations.
Our involvement in the GNU project grew with contributions to the
web standards, the fact that the machine is now used as a secondary
DNS for the gnu.org domain, evaluation of candidate GNU packages
and heavy contribution to the maintainance and evolution of
[4]Savannah. We also benefit from the infrastructure of the GNU
project since our domain, mailing lists, CVS tree etc. are hosted
on other GNU machines.
Political and legal actions are also doing fine since we had
opportunities to stress the importance of legal protection of Free
Software, met with government officials occasionally. To be
completely honest we cannot really claim a noteworthy achivement on
this front.
Last but not least, it is now established that FSF France activity
is ruled by a steady flow of volunteers, contributing their time in
occasional burst and happy enthusiasm. Around ten volunteers
motivated themselves to fight for Free Software with us in the past
three months. This may seem very few people and yet we achieved to
do a significant amount of work. Nowadays every good will counts
and your action can really make the difference, as long as you can
spare some time to drink a beer or relax between two sessions. We
want to keep going in the long term and this requires a bit of fun
from time to time.
On cooperation
The collaborative spirit described in the [5]previous report is
certainly our most pro-eminent achievement. Our motto could be that
we don't undertake actions alone. It is better not to undertake an
action if we fail to actually cooperate with Free Software movement
people and organizations already involved.
Although this spirit makes sense in writing it requires a
significant amount of effort. The syndrome of replicating effort
does not only apply to software. Organizations also have a natural
tendency to undertake new projects before searching for similar
efforts, before actually engaging a dialog with people involved,
before trying everything to cooperate.
The bandwidth of the brain is significantly higher than the
bandwidth of the mail. If all the dialog needed to start a new
project occurs in the brain of a single person, the project will
take off rapidly, the first version will be available fast and
bring some results within days. When you extend the dialog to other
people and organizations, it gets significantly slower at first.
Only later does it become faster and stronger. Yes, union is a
force but it works slower and is not fit for the impatient.
A fairly good example is our involvement in the infrastructure of
the GNU project. From the beginning we started with the idea that
all our technical infrastructure should use and contribute to the
infrastructure of the GNU project. The advantages are pretty
obvious: why run and maintain Mailman, exim, ftp server, web
server, CVS when those are already available and maintained by the
GNU project ? The drawbacks are also pretty obvious: understanding
the infrastructure of the GNU project, contribute to it so that it
fits our needs introduces a significant bootstrap delay.
The machine we installed in France is now fully integrated to the
GNU project, meaning that it is monitored and maintained by the GNU
project. This a win for us. It also runs the secondary DNS for
gnu.org domains. This is a win for the GNU project. Mailing lists
and web site for FSF Europe are managed by machines in Boston. This
is win for us. People involved in the system administration of the
machine in France know the infrastructure of the GNU project and
can contribute to the maintainance of other machines. This a win
for the GNU project.
This may seem an example that is of no great consequence but in our
eyes it reflects the essence of cooperation. It's slower but it
makes us stronger. This example is also chosen on purpose because
we believe that technical heterogeneity is often the first obstacle
to cooperation on non technical matters. Say, for instance, that
two Free Software organizations want to share their calendars to
coordinate their political actions. If they use technical tools
that are significantly different it may prove inconvenient for them
to actually do it. We are not saying that it is a major problem, we
are not saying that everybody should use the exact same tools or
nothing. We only acknowledge that cooperation on a technical
infrastructure is a win/win situation that also removes an obstacle
for cooperation on non technical matters. Given the fact that we
have scarce resources at all time, there is no reason to discard
this advantage.
Projects
[6]Translation of the GNU GPL in French ([7]previous report).
Interviews of [8]Mélanie Clément-Fontaine (french, 19 May
2001), and [9]Benjamin Drieu (french, 17 May 2001) about the
translation of the GNU GPL were conducted to keep people
informed of the progress made so far.
Till Jaeger and Axel Metzger, two German lawyers in contact
with the FSF Europe are also following and participating to
this project. They are working on launching a similar effort in
their country.
During the [10]Libre Software Meeting in Bordeaux, Eben Moglen
came to express his vision of the future of the GPL. A workshop
involving Mélanie Clément Fontaine, Eben Moglen, Bradley M.
Kuhn, Anne Østergaard and around twenty people interested in
the subject allowed to clarify very important points. Eben
Moglen stressed the fact that it is important that the
translation matches the following constraints:
+ It must not be used as a legally binding license, it must
remain informative, the English version being the only one
that has a legal force.
+ It must not be bound to contract law
Volunteers: Mélanie Clément-Fontaine, Benjamin Drieu, Frédéric
Couchet, Olivier Berger, Sebastien Blondeel, Loïc Dachary, Till
Jaeger, Axel Metzger.
[11]Patents
APRIL (FSFE associate organization) launched a call for action
to encourage people to act against patents. They propose
specific actions and provide all the material needed to
strongly react against the report given to the french
government that is in favor of software patents.
Late June, Richard M. Stallman was in Paris and proposed an
idea for a [12]program against software patents to Jacques Le
Marois (CEO of Mandrake).
On the subject of patents we follow the lead of APRIL and AFUL.
Volunteers: Frédéric Couchet, Jérôme Dominguez.
[13]The four freedoms ([14]previous report)
A steady flow of people are participating.
Volunteers: Raphaël Rousseau, Loïc Dachary.
[15]Education
Hilaire Fernandes and other volunteers joined the GNU project
and created the [16]education section of the GNU project. They
established contact with Canadian and Chinese activists
involved in providing Free Software for educational purposes.
Hilaire published an [17]essay (in french) about Free Software
and education. Verbatim copy is permitted and encouraged. It
also contains a detailed history of the Free Software movement.
On the subject of education we follow the lead of OFSET. Many
people are involved and their actions deserves an independent
activity report.
Volunteers: [18]savannah list
[19]Science
Joris Van der Hoven initiated an APRIL working group to support
Free Software in science. He works for a french university
himself and advocates that software made while conducting a
research financed by the government should be released as Free
Software. The very spirit of research does not fit well with
the restrictions imposed by proprietary licenses. Besides,
citizens are not too happy when they have to finance the
research and buy the product when it is released.
A list was created (address@hidden) to discuss
this subject.
Volunteers: Joris Van der Hoven, Gilles Veillon, Jeremy Nestel,
Jérôme Pansanel
[21]Community Positioning System (Coposys).
Olivier Berger [22]proposed a project to visualize Free
Software friends around the globe. Cyril Bouthors
[23]implemented and installed a first version and hundreds of
people registered from all over the world.
Volunteers: Cyril Bouthors, Olivier Berger.
[24]Electronic Voting
An information page on electronic voting issues was produced to
highlight the importance of Free Software in these matter. We
do not have the ambition to spend time to try to solve this
enormous problem at present. We merely keep in touch with
french people interested in the subject and store information.
Volunteers: Olivier Berger, Loïc Dachary.
[25]Press Review
Nicole Ciry and Gilles Veillon launched the project of
gathering french articles about Free Software. They produced a
methodology, explained it in a web page and gather a copy of
the first articles. Those articles are sent once a month to the
FSF in Boston and the first shipment was made early July.
Volunteers: Nicole Ciry, Gilles Veillon.
GNU project information relay (was GNU help desk) ([26]previous
report)
In the previous report this was listed as GNU help desk which
was kind of inaccurate. The proximity of french people involved
in the GNU project makes it easier for other french people to
get involved in the GNU project, in a way or another. Some
developers come to us for various points related to the GNU
project:
+ A software they wrote is being evaluated for inclusion in the
GNU project. These requests are handled thru [27]the
address@hidden mailing list.
+ They wrote a software and wonder what it means to become part
of the GNU project.
+ They would like to help in the system administration of the
GNU project.
+ They have an idea to improve the infrastructure of the GNU
project.
We had many contacts are related to these points. Here are the
two most pro-eminent.
Loïc Dachary got involved in the evaluation of a software that
wanted to become part of the GNU project ([28]phpGroupWare). It
was the occasion for him to get practical experience of this
process in order to better answer questions.
A pretty [29]long thread regarding the rationale of the
evaluation process and other issues related to GNU was launched
by Denis Barbier. His critic views and comparisons with the
Debian process are very valuable, specially since he is not a
member of the GNU project. To be completely honest no visible
modifications of the GNU project are a direct consequence of
this discussion. Mainly because Loïc Dachary is postponing this
for no other reason than lack of time.
Volunteers: Loïc Dachary.
GNU and Debian
French people involved in the GNU, Debian and FreeBSD project
[30]met to drink a beer and share their experiences. This was a
chance to know each other and discover possible cooperation
grounds. No report of this meeting is available, unfortunately.
We had another opportunity to meet and discuss during the
[31]LSM since the [32]Debian conference 1 was hosted by LSM.
As a direct consequence of these talks, some concrete things
happened. That may not be all, but that is what we are aware
of.
+ Loïc Dachary who is a [33]member of the GNU project also
became a [34]Debian developer
+ Igor Genibel who is a [35]Debian developer also became a
[36]member of the GNU project.
+ Martin Michlmayr, a leading force of the [37]Debian QA group
(re)joined the [38]GNU project to improve the QA of GNU with
the help of the Debian tools.
Of course we discussed a lot about the philosophical issues
that keep the GNU and Debian organizations apart. The GNU
project would like to see the explicit support of non free
software removed from the Debian social contract and
identification of the software packages in the main part of
Debian that do not qualify as Free Software according to GNU.
Solving these issues is an on-going effort on both sides. The
Debian community also has some claims for the GNU project and
[39]Denis Barbier voiced some of them.
Volunteers: Raphaël Rousseau, Loïc Dachary, Olivier Berger.
[40]Technopole Logiciel Libre ([41]previous report)
Frédéric Couchet maintains good relationships with the
Technopole Logiciel Libre. A result of this cooperation was the
interview of Philippe Carpentier on Internet actu video
newspaper. The Technopole Logiciel Libre was also invited to
[42]LSM where Philippe Carpentier made a speech to explain the
goals and philosophy of the project.
Philippe Carpentier proposed to launch a European contest for
Free Software and is working on this idea with Frédéric
Couchet.
Volunteers: Frédéric Couchet, Loïc Dachary, Philippe
Carpentier, Pierre Jarret
[43]Savannah and Europe: CoopX ([44]previous report)
The contacts we had with hosting platforms similar to
[45]Savannah in France triggered the creation of a working
group called [46]CoopX.
The goal of this working group is to define an interchange
format between hosting platforms. [47]SourceForge,
[48]phpGroupWare joined the working group shortly after its
creation. CoopX was also pleased to welcome [49]TuxFamily, a
cooperatively run hosting facility run by french volunteers.
Although we are a founding member of CoopX, the project itself
is neither hosted nor ruled by us. It is a strictly cooperative
effort and every group willing to participate actively is
welcome. Even non free software groups, as long as the format
is decided cooperatively and released under a license that has
the same qualities as the GNU FDL.
Volunteers: Loïc Dachary, Christian Bac, Samuel Tardieu, Dan
Kuykendall, Tim Perdue and many others.
Links with Free Software organizations
In the network of Free Software organizations we actively worked to
establish contacts in order to be able to actually do things in a
coordinated way. The ideal situation would be that each
organization in a given geographical location is able quickly
establish contact with any other organization over the world for a
given action related to education, software development or
political issues. The following list is a map of the network
involving at least one person from FSF France or APRIL.
* [50]FSF.
* [51]FSF Europe.
* [52]FSF Canada.
* [53]FSF India.
* [54]FSF China.
* FSF Japan.
* [55]AFSM.
* [56]GNU Spain.
* [57]ABUL.
* [58]ALDIL.
* [59]ALL.
* [60]AGIL.
* [61]Associazione Software Libero.
* [62]AAUL.
At present we cannot claim any world wide coordinated action but we
sincerely hope it will happen, on the subject of patents for
instance. Do you want to take the lead ?-)
FSF France is tightly bound to APRIL and we had four meetings in
the past three months. Two meeting reports are available.
* [63]July 23 2001
* [64]June 12 2001
A Free Software organization ([65]AGIL) is being created in Portugal.
A lot of discussions with APRIL were engaged to share their
experience. A similar dialog is being established with Masayuki Ida to
create a Free Software organization in Japan. Masayuki Ida will be
visiting France in October and he wants to meet with APRIL activists
on this subject.
Matthias Saou, former president of the french organization ALDIL moved
to Spain recently and agreed to act as a liaison with Jose Marchesi
and GNU Spain.
GNU project ([66]previous report)
[67]Usenix award
During the 2001 Usenix conference in Boston, Robert Chassel
received an award in the name of all the contributors to the
GNU project. We are proud to broadcast this award to all the
people who contributed to the GNU project thru FSF France
recently, by installing the first machine of the GNU project
outside the US (fr.fsf.org) or by contributing to the hardware
upgrade of Savannah (savannah.gnu.org).
[68]Sysadmin fr.fsf.org
Rodolphe Quiedeville, Cedric Valignat and Jean-Louis Bergamot
are also doing occasional system administration on the GNU
machine in France and were very efficient when handling a minor
security alert. Cedric is now taking care of the Internet
connection of the GNU machine in France and is in contact with
Joel N Weber II for this purpose.
Volunteers: Rodolphe Quiedeville, Cedric Valignat, Jean-Louis
Bergamot, Loïc Dachary, Joel N. Weber II, Frédéric Couchet.
[69]Savannah ([70]previous report)
The [71]installation of the new hardware allowed Savannah to
grow. It is now serving more than 200 projects and around 1 500
members joined it.
The most important event is that Savannah is now open to Free
Software projects that do not (yet ;-) joined the GNU project.
This allows candidate packages to the GNU project to develop
and grow while going thru the application process. At present
87 such projects are hosted on Savannah.
Now that phpGroupWare is dubbed a GNU package, the perspective
of migrating the software used to run Savannah under
phpGroupWare is more likely to become a reality. At present,
there is no concrete plan in this direction but it is actively
discussed.
Volunteers: Loïc Dachary, Jaime Villate, Guillaume Morin, Joel
N. Weber II, Mark H. Weaver.
[72]GNU Search
As of today the [73]GNU search team was created to maintain and
improve the search facility of the GNU project. Cyril Bouthors,
Igor Genibel and Helios de Creisquer launched this project.
They started as volunteer system administrators of the GNU
machine in France (fr.fsf.org). By doing simple tasks in this
context they became familiar with the GNU project and proposed
to become more commited to the infrastructure.
Volunteers: Loïc Dachary, Cyril Bouthors, Igor Genibel, Helios
de Creisquer.
[74]GNU DNS
Joel N. Weber II monitored the fr.fsf.org machine during a few
weeks and found that it could do a reasonable secondary name
server for the gnu.org domain. He installed it about a month
ago and it's running fine. Should the north American continent
disappear the domain will still be resolved :-}
Volunteers: Joel N. Weber II, Loïc Dachary, Cyril Bouthors.
Events and advocacy
We would like to acknowledge the countless advocacy efforts made by
people tuned on the [75]FSF France mailing list. All of them would
deserve an entry in this report, laziness is the only reason why they
do not show. We miss some bits such as interviews (Europe II Bordeaux
for instance) we never had a chance to listen. If you heard about
them, please [76]send us a note.
[77]Microsoft FUD ([78]previous report)
We relayed press releases. RMS speech was translated and
broadcasted. We did not do anything significant at the national
level.
Unisys studies Free Software ([79]previous report)
Unisys politely dismissed our help proposal to write the
report, although they invited us to feed them with data. That
was not what we wanted.
Richard M. Stallman suggested that the best course of action
would be to publish an article explaining why the study
conducted by Unisys could be biased. Nobody took the task and
the report is probably finished by now. We failed on this
advocacy issue.
BBC World
BBC World wanted to interview a Free Software advocate for a
television show in London. We proposed that Phil Hands speak in
our name. A short time frame did not leave much room for
cooperation and it turned out that the journalist really wanted
a confrontation between the proprietary world and the Free
Software world. At present it is still unclear what the result
will be. If you ever see the show, let us know.
Volunteers: Phil Hands, Richard M. Stallman, Frédéric Couchet,
Loïc Dachary.
[80]Le Journal du Net ([81]previous report)
This well known french online newspaper changed their category
entitled Open Source to Logiciel Libre. We are not entirely
happy about the accuracy of their articles but they show a good
will that we find remarkable.
[82]FAQ hardware producers
Marc-Aurèle Darche and Philippe Coulonges wrote a FAQ to inform
hardware producers about the advantages of Free Software
drivers. This is the first work that involves a cooperation
between APRIL, AFUL and FSF France. Marc-Aurèle Darche deserves
all the credit for making this joint effort a reality. Although
FSF France will not endorse the document produced because it
partially advocates for the Open Source movement, working on it
allowed us to contribute to the ideas related to Free Software.
We will keep the draft directory alive even after the release
of the FAQ to show how it evolved. In my eyes it is a nice
example of the fundamental difference between the Open Source
movement and the Free Software movement. Some people claim Free
Software and Open Source are two words on top of the same
movement ? Check the [83]first version of the document, rather
Open Source style and the [84]second version proposed, more
Free Software style. You will see a visible difference in the
spirit and very few differences in the wording.
Volunteers: Marc-Aurèle Darche, Philippe Coulonges.
[85]DCSSI and GNU PG
The french government defines a list of software accredited to
provide encryption. During LSM Werner Koch asked for volunteers
to register GNUPG. Some people show interest to do that but the
action did not start yet.
[86]CEENET
Sebastien Blondeel is attending CEENET in Hungaria (August 20).
He will bring goodies from APRIL and FSF Europe and spread the
word in our name. He will meet Shooby Ban who is potentially
interested in launching a Free Software dedicated organization.
People attending CEENET are not specifically interested in Free
Software, that makes his mission even more interesting.
Volunteers: Sebastien Blondeel.
[87]Unesco
We engaged a discussion with Unesco on the subject of their
Free Software portal because we feel that its content is
problematic in many ways. The people are responsive and we sent
them a proposal to replace the license page.
Volunteers: Loïc Dachary.
[88]SourceForge and VA Linux
We are helping VA Linux to produce a copyright assignment form
for SourceForge authors. The experience of the FSF in this
matter is valuable.
Volunteers: Loïc Dachary.
[89]Propriété intellectuelle , Copyright, Brevets, logiciels libres
A special issue of the french magazine MULTITUDE was published
on the subject of copyright, patents and free software. It
features articles from Richard M. Stallman and Eben Moglen and
many other Free Software advocates. Frédéric Couchet and
Benjamin Drieu were very involved in making this special issue
a reality.
Volunteers: Frédéric Couchet, Benjamin Drieu.
[90]Libre Software Meeting
The event was far too rich to summarize in this report. To our
knowledge it is the only event in the world exclusively
dedicated to Free Software and organized only by volunteers.
Hundreds of users and developers from all around the world
attended this event. When compared to events like LinuxWord
where at least half the people and organizations present are
indeed interested or involved in non free software, it makes a
huge difference. Some [91]pictures were taken for the record.
Next year event will be organized together with the FSF France,
with [92]technical help from the GNU project.
We had the opportunity to [93]meet people involved in Free
Software organizations from all over the world.
Frédéric Couchet and Carl W. Vilbrandt organized and
participated to the [94]Law, Economy, Politic and libre
software session.
Frédéric Couchet introduced the FSF Europe to the audience in a
one hour speech.
Loïc Dachary was an informal spoke-person of the [95]AFSM
during the [96]AAUL meeting.
Loïc Dachary shortly spoke about Savannah during the [97]Libre
Software for Communication session.
The FSF France actively participated to the discussions of the
[98]APRIL members Convention. Jaime Villate also attended the
event in the name of the future Free Software organization
(AGIL will be the name) that is being created in Portugal.
INJEP
INJEP is launching courses for administrations and non profit
organizations in France. These courses are co-financed by the
government and cost 500 F for one day. Benjamin Drieu and
Jeremy Nestel did some work on a three days course on Free
Software at the initiation level. Although not certain yet,
this can lead to a cheap way for people to be introduced to the
Free Software tools. This project is at a very early stage and
volunteers are very needed.
Volunteers: Jeremy Nestel, Benjamin Drieu, Frédéric Couchet.
Information infrastructure
[99]FSF Europe migration
The [100]FSF Europe web was migrated to the
france.fsfeurope.org machine. This was mainly done to ease the
maintainance process of the web and increase the page
generation rate without risking to overload the gnudist.gnu.org
machine which is already hosting the [101]GNU web site.
Volunteers: Frédéric Couchet, Loïc Dachary
Contact Database ([102]previous report)
This area was rather neglected and did not progress much. The
situation improved a little since Bradley M. Kuhn explained in
detail what we would need and made contacts with Dan Kuykendall
on this subject. We also discovered that XML Vcard was
published earlier this year by W3C and this will definitely be
the format on which we will be working.
Volunteers: Bradley M. Kuhn, Loïc Dachary.
[103]Web standards
A script repository was created so that directories on various
GNU machines handling web sites can use them. The first script
to enter the arena is a symbolic link builder for CVS HTML
pages.
The task of improving the web standards is enormous. However,
it is a very rewarding since it brings results rapidly.
A rather unexpected improvement comes from [104]the hardware
FAQ. The authors use the technical infrastructure of the GNU
project to publish their drafts. Since the source format is
DocBook, we had some interesting exchanges on formating issues.
It appears that the machine fr.fsf.org now has a proper set of
software to produce output from DocBook sources. Since there
also exist a translator from DocBook to texinfo, one might be
tempted to write DocBook documents from now on. This is food
for thought, there are many issues to consider, one of which
being the relatively immature state of the Free Software
DocBook formating tools.
Volunteers: Jaime Villate, Paul Vischer, Loïc Dachary, Richard
M. Stallman, Marc-Aurèle Darche
[105]Audio and video repository
A large audio and video repository was created. The primary
purpose is to store the FSF Award 2000 video file (1.2Gb) and
400Mb audio files. There is a total of 22Gb available.
Volunteers: Loïc Dachary
[106]News channel
The RSS based news channel of FSF France is available on FSF
Europe. Olivier Berger enhanced it to display only the latest
news on the front page and all the archives in the news
subdirectory.
They are now dispatched on a daily basis by mail on the
address@hidden and address@hidden
mailing-lists (resp. in english, and in french). This allows
people interested in Free Software movement to keep informed of
FSF France activity. To subscribe to this mailing-list,
[109]send a mail to address@hidden with the
subject "subscribe"
Volunteers: Olivier Berger, Loïc Dachary
Administrativia
[110]Donations ([111]previous report)
We did not chase donations and (what a surprise ;-) nobody sent
a cent to FSF France in the past months. The good news is that
we did not spend any money either.
Cyril Bouthors and Noémie Roche [112]worked hard on the tax
deductibility issue. The papers were sent to the administration
and we are waiting for their answer.
Volunteers: Olivier Berger, Raphaël Rousseau, Frédéric Couchet,
Loïc Dachary, Noémie Roche, Cyril Bouthors.
Business Cards
A new set of 200 business cards was produced for future events.
Volunteers: Frédéric Couchet
[113]Loïc Dachary
Updated: $Date: 2001/08/21 23:47:22 $ $Author: loic $
References
1. http://france.fsfeurope.org/
2. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-05-20-01.en.html
3. http://lsm.abul.org/
4. http://savannah.gnu.org/
5. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-05-20-01.en.html
6. http://france.fsfeurope.org/gpl/
7. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-05-20-01.en.html#gplfrench
8. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-05-17-01.fr.html
9. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-05-15-01.fr.html
10. http://lsm.abul.org/
11. http://www.april.org/actions/brevets/academie.html
12. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-06-26-01.fr.html
13. http://france.fsfeurope.org/libre.en.html
14. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-05-20-01.en.html#freedom
15. http://www.ofset.org/
16. http://www.gnu.org/education/
17.
http://www.ofset.org/information/papers/free-software-and-education-fr.html
18. http://savannah.gnu.org/project/memberlist.php?group_id=200
19. http://france.fsfeurope.org/science/
20. http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-france-sci/
21. http://france.fsfeurope.org/coposys/
22.
http://savannah.gnu.org/pm/task.php?func=detailtask&project_task_id=156&group_id=53&group_project_id=48
23. http://france.fsfeurope.org/coposys/
24. http://france.fsfeurope.org/voting/voting.en.html
25. http://france.fsfeurope.org/collecte.en.html
26. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-05-20-01.en.html#gnuinfo
27. http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-eval/
28. http://www.phpgroupware.org/
29. http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/fsfe-france/2001-June/000694.html
30. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-06-05-01.fr.html
31. http://lsm.abul.org/
32. http://lsm.abul.org/program/topic20/topic20.php3
33. http://www.gnu.org/people/
34. http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=loic%40senga.org
35. http://www.debian.org/devel/people
36. http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-search/
37. http://qa.debian.org/people.html
38. mailto:address@hidden
39. http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/fsfe-france/2001-June/000694.html
40. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-05-09-01.fr.html
41. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-05-20-01.en.html#technopole
42. http://lsm.abul.org/
43. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-06-14-01.en.html
44. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-05-20-01.en.html#savannah
45. http://savannah.gnu.org/
46. http://coopx.eu.org/
47. http://sf.net/
48. http://phpgroupware.org/
49. http://www.tuxfamily.org/
50. http://www.fsf.org/
51. http://www.fsfeurope.org/
52. http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfc-discuss/
53. http://fsf.org.in/
54. http://www.rons.net.cn/english/Links/fsf-china/
55. http://cyberlink.idws.com/fsm/
56. http://es.gnu.org/
57. http://www.abul.org/
58. http://www.aldil.org/
59. http://www.lastjeudi.org/
60. http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/fsfe-portugal/
61. http://www.softwarelibero.org/
62. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-07-05-01.en.html
63. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-07-23-01.en.html
64. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-06-12-01.fr.html
65. http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/fsfe-portugal/
66. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-05-20-01.en.html#gnu
67. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-08-20-01.en.xhtml
68. http://france.fsfeurope.org/server/
69. http://savannah.gnu.org/
70. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-05-20-01.en.html#gnusavannah
71. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-05-28-01.en.html
72. http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-search/
73. http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-search/
74. http://france.fsfeurope.org/server/
75. http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/fsfe-france/
76. mailto:address@hidden
77. http://www.gnu.org/events/rms-nyu-2001-transcript.txt
78. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-05-20-01.en.html#microsoftfud
79. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-05-20-01.en.html#unisys
80. http://solutions.journaldunet.com/
81. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-05-20-01.en.html#journaldunet
82.
http://france.fsfeurope.org/drafts/faq-constructeurs/generated-html/FAQConstructeurs.fr.html
83. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-08-20-01.en.xhtml
84. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-08-20-01.en.xhtml
85. http://www.gnupg.org/
86. http://www.ceenet.org/
87. http://www.unesco.org/webworld/portal_freesoft/
88. http://sf.net/
89. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-06-11-01.fr.html
90. http://lsm.abul.org/
91. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-07-09-01.en.html
92. http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/lsm
93. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-07-04-01.en.html
94. http://lsm.abul.org/program/topic16/topic16.php3
95. http://cyberlink.idws.com/fsm/
96. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-07-05-01.en.html
97. http://lsm.abul.org/program/topic05/topic05.php3
98. http://lsm.abul.org/program/topic21/topic21.php3
99. http://www.fsfeurope.org/
100. http://www.fsfeurope.org/
101. http://www.gnu.org/
102. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-05-20-01.en.html#contact
103. http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/www/
104. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-08-20-01.en.xhtml#faq
105. http://audio-video.gnu.org/
106. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/
107. http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-newsfr-en
108. http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-newsfr-fr
109. mailto:address@hidden
110. http://france.fsfeurope.org/donations/donations.en.html
111. http://france.fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-05-20-01.en.html#donations
112.
http://savannah.gnu.org/pm/task.php?func=detailtask&project_task_id=141&group_id=53&group_project_id=37
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Fsfe-france] FSF France activity report,
Loic Dachary <=