[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AFFS Website (Was: Re: [Fsfe-uk] Once more, unto the constitution, dear
From: |
Alex Hudson |
Subject: |
AFFS Website (Was: Re: [Fsfe-uk] Once more, unto the constitution, dear friends...) |
Date: |
19 Feb 2002 09:19:42 +0000 |
On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 09:13, MJ Ray wrote:
> > www.affs.org.uk has had 'stuff' on it since sometime yesterday; whether
> > or not these pages are real or fake I've yet to figure out ;-)
>
> Aha! Sort of a usability graveyard (I have no CSS in the usual browser),
Text, links, what more do you want? The moon on a stick? :)
Seriously, I am willing to break the old content/presentation rule a
little bit - swap some divs for ps, etc. The site should work on
anything though, it's just going to look boring...
> moan to you were expecting, I think? Firing up Mozilla displays something
> in black on dark green that I can't read. Maybe that's more what you
> expected? ;-)
Sounds like the colour registration on your monitor is way out :P
I'll change the palette to some nice pastel shades then... I suppose
that might be better in terms of colour blindness, etc., too.
> Indeed. However, I think I'm a bad person to suggest what questions are
> frequently asked. I'd start to break the FAQ up into sections (even if only
> on the one page) very soon, though.
Yep. I'm also intending on anchoring & linking it up.
> OK, what do we want? News, About, Documents and Contacts are obvious
> top-level sections to me. What else?
I suppose in a way that we'll find a place for things when we need to
put them up. So, it would kind of be content-driven in that regard: what
I've tried not to do is go around duplicating information that is
elsewhere just to fill the site out - we'll probably fill it out fairly
nicely naturally anyway.
> Validating pages? tidy is your friend.
tidy is a sawnoff shotgun ;) That said, I did run validate over them, so
they definitely should be pretty close to the spec.
Cheers,
Alex.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [Fsfe-uk] Once more, unto the constitution, dear friends..., MJ Ray, 2002/02/18
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Once more, unto the constitution, dear friends..., Neil Levine, 2002/02/18
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Once more, unto the constitution, dear friends..., MJ Ray, 2002/02/18
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Once more, unto the constitution, dear friends..., Alex Hudson, 2002/02/19
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Once more, unto the constitution, dear friends..., MJ Ray, 2002/02/19
- AFFS Website (Was: Re: [Fsfe-uk] Once more, unto the constitution, dear friends...),
Alex Hudson <=
- Re: AFFS Website (Was: Re: [Fsfe-uk] Once more, unto the constitution, dear friends...), MJ Ray, 2002/02/19
- Re: AFFS Website (Was: Re: [Fsfe-uk] Once more, unto the constitution, dear friends...), Neil Levine, 2002/02/19
- Re: AFFS Website (Was: Re: [Fsfe-uk] Once more, unto the constitution, dear friends...), MJ Ray, 2002/02/19
- Re: AFFS Website (Was: Re: [Fsfe-uk] Once more, unto the constitution, dear friends...), Neil Levine, 2002/02/19
- Re: AFFS Website (Was: Re: [Fsfe-uk] Once more, unto the constitution, dear friends...), Alex Hudson, 2002/02/19
- Re: AFFS Website (Was: Re: [Fsfe-uk] Once more, unto the constitution, dear friends...), Neil Levine, 2002/02/19
- Re: AFFS Website (Was: Re: [Fsfe-uk] Once more, unto the constitution, dear friends...), MJ Ray, 2002/02/19
- Re: AFFS Website (Was: Re: [Fsfe-uk] Once more, unto the constitution, dear friends...), Neil Levine, 2002/02/19
- Re: AFFS Website (Was: Re: [Fsfe-uk] Once more, unto the constitution, dear friends...), MJ Ray, 2002/02/19
- Re: AFFS Website (Was: Re: [Fsfe-uk] Once more, unto the constitution, dear friends...), Neil Levine, 2002/02/19