[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Fsfe-uk] Re: Frod
From: |
Richard Smedley |
Subject: |
[Fsfe-uk] Re: Frod |
Date: |
04 Jun 2003 16:24:27 +0100 |
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 15:52, Chris Croughton wrote:
> So in summary:
>
> Ford (UK and US) were a big offender, and arrogant about it.
>
> Ford UK have changed and the site is now mostly accessible.
>
> Ford US need JS for a redirector on the first page (and that's /all/
> that first page is used for!). After that, it's not as good as Ford
> UK (fewer ALT tags on images, for instance) but looks probably usable.
Two cheers, then :-)
> This has to be a company-wide policy change. I wonder whether US
> disabilities legislation had anything to do with it? Or maybe they
> had a person with clue come in.
Both posible - the US legislation is beginning to
make a huge difference. It may also give GNOME a
huge boost too :o)
> I'll be contacting Ford UK and congratulating them on changing the
> policy and on the revised website.
Good idea - many companies take note of such
positive feedback.
- Richard
--
Richard Smedley
http://www.linuxuserexpo.com/
24-26 June, NEC, Birmingham,UK
``Any attempt to brew coffee with a teapot should result in the error
code "418 I'm a teapot". The resulting entity body MAY be short
and stout.'' -- RFC 2324
This email message may contain privileged or confidential information. The
information is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that disclosure,
copying, distribution or the taking of action in reliance on the contents of
this electronic information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
email in error, please notify address@hidden immediately via reply email. Any
personal content in this email is that of the individual author and should not
be interpreted as being endorsed by the company in whole or in part. Whilst
care is taken, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that this
email is free from virus infection, and no responsibility is accepted by Live
Publishing Group for any disruption, loss or damage arising from its receipt or
use.
- [Fsfe-uk] Free internet (technologically), Ramanan Selvaratnam, 2003/06/04
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Free internet (technologically), Chris Croughton, 2003/06/04
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Free internet (technologically), Alex Hudson, 2003/06/04
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Free internet (technologically), Chris Croughton, 2003/06/04
- Frod [was Re: [Fsfe-uk] Free internet (technologically)], Richard Smedley, 2003/06/04
- Re: Frod [was Re: [Fsfe-uk] Free internet (technologically)], Chris Croughton, 2003/06/04
- [Fsfe-uk] Re: Frod,
Richard Smedley <=
- Web standard compliance, accessibility and free software was Re: Frod [was Re: [Fsfe-uk] Free internet (technologically)], Simon Waters, 2003/06/05
- Re: Web standard compliance, accessibility and free software was Re: Frod [was Re: [Fsfe-uk] Free internet (technologically)], Robin Green, 2003/06/05
- Re: Web standard compliance, accessibility and free software was Re: Frod [was Re: [Fsfe-uk] Free internet (technologically)], Marc Eberhard, 2003/06/05
- Re: Web standard compliance, accessibility and free software was Re: Frod [was Re: [Fsfe-uk] Free internet (technologically)], Robin Green, 2003/06/05
- Re: Web standard compliance, accessibility and free software was Re: Frod [was Re: [Fsfe-uk] Free internet (technologically)], MJ Ray, 2003/06/05
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Free internet (technologically), MJ Ray, 2003/06/04
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Free internet (technologically), Andrew Savory, 2003/06/04
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Free internet (technologically), PFJ, 2003/06/04