[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: An ignorant question?
From: |
ian |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: An ignorant question? |
Date: |
10 Jun 2003 08:51:54 +0100 |
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 08:35, Neil Darlow wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> In response to Ian Lynch's statement that client-server and web browser are
> the way to go for e.g. an accountancy suite, I would offer the following in
> mitigation of a more dedicated solution.
> 1) A networked client/server model may be convenient but it is potentially
> less secure than a locally run solution.
Well if banks are prepared to do on-line transactions I don't see why
you can't make it secure. You could of course simply run on your own
local network if you trust it or run on a single machine as
client/server. At least you have the choice.
> 2) Both KDE and Gnome feature object embedding technology that would permit
> accounts data to be embedded in spreadsheets, word processed documents etc.
> which a web browser based solution would have difficulty in emulating. I
> don't discount a more traditional X interface (please, no more X-windows,
> there is no such beast :) as provided by e.g. Lesstif.
To me that functionality is less important than flexibility. OLE is IMHO
less of a priority than being able to simply transfer data to other apps
> 3) Consider the case of an individual running SQL Ledger on a laptop with a
> wireless network interface. Not only does he need to have apache installed
> but he may also need to secure it for localhost-only access. Sensitive
> accounts may require him to run an HTTPS server with the additional setup
> that requires.
We would do it for him a lot less expensively than the cost of Sage ;-)
> 4) I accept that a SQL database is a good medium for accounts data storage
> but
> we should also consider technologies such as XML for data interchange and
> what about encryption of the data for sensitive applications? Just
> arbitrarily using a client/server database model might not be the most
> appropriate solution in this scenario.
Ideally have both, but if we do finally extricate ourselves from Sage, I
will go for a web based system and SQL ledger already exists.
--
ian <address@hidden>
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: An ignorant question?, Mark Preston, 2003/06/08
- [Fsfe-uk] Re: An ignorant question?, Neil Darlow, 2003/06/10
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: An ignorant question?, Chris Croughton, 2003/06/10
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: An ignorant question?, Robin Green, 2003/06/10
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: An ignorant question?, Chris Croughton, 2003/06/10