|
From: | Ralph Janke |
Subject: | Re: [Fsfe-uk] The Reg on RMS in London |
Date: | Fri, 28 May 2004 18:34:36 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) |
James Heald wrote:
I don't see the problem here. Freedom and liberty are for me as essential for quality of live as is health. If software patents restrict my ability to enjoy my interests in an unwarranted way, than it is for me not very different to a desease that deabilitates me to follow my interests in that way. And just to complete the record I have been chronically sick over some period of time that almost let to my dead. Actually be doctors were amazed that I hadn't died. And I can tell you the time leading up to the point when the problem was found an cured was very deabilitating. Even that is not necessarily 100% comparable with a desease which has no cure.Alex Hudson wrote:On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 16:32, James Heald wrote:... doesn't like his dead Africans analogy http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/05/25/stallman_lecture/I found that commentary strange. When I read it, I assumed RMS was drawing a parallel between software patents blocking innovation and pharmaceutical patents blocking healthcare - whereas, the Reg argument seems to be more of a 'RMS Godwin'd himself by talking about AIDs in Africa' if you see what I mean. RMS's point read to me as a subtle 'patents can destroy communities' - whereas they seemed to see it as an inflammatory 'stopping programmers working is like letting Africans die', which I don't think (hope :) was his point. That said, even if he meant what I thought he did but was interpreted by the Reg to mean something else, it probably was a bad analogy, probably not one I would use personally (or could have been made more explicitly about patents - but of course, without the original text, we don't know what he said....)His line was that when Governments say "look, software patents aren't so bad, there are lots of free software projects still standing", this holds about as much water as saying "Look, AIDS isn't so bad, there are lots of Africans still standing".The problem with the analogy is just what Lucy Sheffield says -- from the point of view of bare logical structure, maybe it is an effective reductio ad absurdum. But that ignores the human level, where even hinting at any comparability between the two is likely to draw a sharp intake of breath, and in very questionable taste.
That are my very personal 2 cent, Ralph Janke
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |