LGOL-Net [was: Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fsfe-uk] portugal and free software]]

[Graham Seaman]

Graham Seaman wrote:

> In some ways it looks way better than what's happening here, in others 
> they are a bit behind -
> for example, the pilot projects at council level kind of map to APLAWs 
> and related things here.
> What we should be pressing for now is not setting up the pilots, but 
> for the outcomes to be
> opensourced. For example, the protocols the pilots developed for data 
> exchange are as far as
> I know not released publicly, so the little clutch of proprietary 
> firms that know about them get
> to keep their monopoly. But then I'm not in that process and may be 
> talking rubbish - this is mostly
> surmise.

I was talking rubbish. My apologies.

In fact, LGOL-Net is GPL and  LGOL-X is LGPL. See
http://www.lgolnet.org

Has anyone tried working with them?

Graham