[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] osc? who?
From: |
MJ Ray |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] osc? who? |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:33:10 +0000 |
On 2004-11-29 23:32:30 +0000 Graham Seaman <address@hidden>
wrote:
On the other hand I just clickede that Turo technology is in there -
maybe MJ
is the power behind the throne ;-)
Actually, the turuloj wanted more information about the project and
haven't sent in any paperwork as far as I know. I think we wanted to
know who the other partners would be, what our liability would be and
how direction would be decided. We got an answer on the direction when
they announced an executive board including some people we usually
disagree with. The list of members on the web site is interesting, but
we wonder how many are really members.
We've not heard anything about OSC for a while, but aren't
particularly concerned about getting ourselves out of or into it. Turo
Technology is definitely not an active member at present. The text on
our entry is a reworded rip from our web site (for we do not talk
about "Open Source"). We're doing very nicely thank you from local
public-sector projects and aren't worried about London-based national
bids just now.
It is quite interesting to hear opinions about other people involved
in the consortium, though. I'm surprised that the web site hasn't been
criticised more strongly here for statements like "With Open Source
software there are no licences to track" which really don't help
understanding of free software at all. Even though I disagree with
some of it, I'm surprised they didn't look to somewhere like OSS-Watch
for quality-controlled text.
--
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and not of any group I know
Creative copyleft computing - http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
Unsolicited attachments to the pipex address deleted
Will HLF fund tree-killings? http://www.thewalks.co.uk/