|
From: | Samuel Liddicott |
Subject: | Re: [Fsfe-uk] Acceptable formats |
Date: | Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:32:52 +0000 |
User-agent: | Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) |
John Seago wrote:
You observation is correct but incomplete. It is also restricted to those with which "good" non-microsoft software can cope. There any many other text document formats that MS software can cope with, so too can other companies software. I think the full observation would include "common subset" somewhere it it, and "well known", perhaps "widely supported". .doc is definitely a "de-facto standard", rtf is a published standard. It is fair for them to be able to accept formats that most "good" software can produce, for 2 reasons: 1) most people can produce it with their software 2) they themselves can read it with their own software The speaker wants to be heard, the writer wants to be read, the listener wants to understand. In a world of dialects something in common must be found, naturally such commonalities (ugh) exist in whatever package they use. Naturally such commonalities are found more in common software. Sam |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |