[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Fsfe-uk] Re: Proposed roadmap
From: |
John Seago |
Subject: |
[Fsfe-uk] Re: Proposed roadmap |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Jul 2005 13:19:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.2 |
On Thursday 01 Jan 1970 00:59, Alex Hudson <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'm personally of the view that accepting amendments is spiritually
> antagonistic to the publication requirements of the proposal;
> particularly where the amendment mostly or wholly supercedes the
> entirety of the proposal.
Having had over thirty years experience of meeting at National level I have
to tell you that not only are amendments acceptable, they are one of the
usual methods of proceeding. Amendments which negate the intention of the
original proposal should not be allowed by the Chair.
> Whether or not that is constitutionally unacceptable I don't know; the
> practice of previous meetings is that it isn't, but I don't think we've
> properly addressed the issue. I certainly feel I couldn't accept an
> amendment to a constitutional proposal I put forward because that
> doesn't give the membership the notice period I think they need to be
> able to properly consider the proposal.
Perhaps then the way forward is to, (once all are agreed in which fora/list
discussion takes place), publish proposals as soon as they are formulated,
to publish counter proposals or amendments as soon as they are formulated,
discuss the merits of each and as the deadline for notice of the meeting
approaches each party holding whatever view will have a chance to see what
the proposals and views of others are/is. Then the Notice of the
appropriate meeting will be able to contain a full agenda. However there
has to be an agreed format for all motions, if the AFFS does not wish to
allow amendment, (even by the Proposer or Seconder), then that is a matter
which will have to be discussed and voted upon at either an AGM, EGM or
SGM.
As I proposed the amendment at last years AGM, I should point out that
there were a number of ways available to me of approaching the motion put
by Alex, all of which can best be described as 'Nuclear Options'.
--
John Seago
GNU/Linux User #219566 http://counter.li.org
AFFS http://www.affs.org.uk/