[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates
From: |
MJ Ray |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:11:25 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Heirloom mailx 12.2 01/07/07 |
"Jon Grant" <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Also, I'm not convinced by someone else's argument which seemed to be
> > roughly that several non-free-software MUAs (Outlook, Thunderbird (OK,
> > so there's IceDove), MSN, Googlemail, Yahoo) send HTML by default.
> > Their operators should fix that configuration error IMO.
>
> That was mine :) Do you really think we should alienate people who are
> considering joining fsf-uk before they even have chance to speak to
> us?
I don't see a simple request as alienating, nor on-server-conversion.
It's far better than a few people flaming them to hell.
> There are no "operators" in the modern world (this isn't Tron!),
I was trying to side-step the whole owner/SaaS debate. I think it's
for MSN, Googlemail, Yahoo to fix their webmails. Sorry for the
confusion. (I doubt they will, as html sells more expensive ads.
Oh, and I see a Tron/MCP analogue for those webmail companies...)
> everyone uses computers and 99% of those people use rich formatted
> messages (email, social networking and IM),
Social networking - at least facebook's Inbox system seems to be plain
text (with a few small add-ons like link-sniffing, but not rich text).
> let's not rule those people out of our fsf-uk discussions.
I don't want anyone to be ruled out, but I don't see why it's better
to rule out plain-texters than htmlers.
> (If they even find us.. as
> forums and social networking are where they will be..). Anyone created
> a Facebook GNU page? ;)
There are many groups, including:-
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2343908713
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2347654509
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2371833611
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=6696368842
[...]
> I don't mean to drag this debate on, but you seem to be responsible
> for the list admin!
Other than above, I don't think this is moving the debate on any.
I explained my next steps at the top: wait for Friday, then count.
Sending more repeats will not help get html here. Convincing other
subscribers might, but I doubt repeats will do that.
Regards,
--
MJ Ray http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html tel:+44-844-4437-237 -
Webmaster-developer, statistician, sysadmin, online shop builder,
consumer and workers co-operative member http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ -
Writing on koha, debian, sat TV, Kewstoke http://mjr.towers.org.uk/
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, (continued)
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Chris Croughton, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Jon Grant, 2008/01/26
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, MJ Ray, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Alex Hudson, 2008/01/26
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, MJ Ray, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Andrew Savory, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, MJ Ray, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Jon Grant, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates,
MJ Ray <=
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Andrew Savory, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, MJ Ray, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Neil Darlow, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Jon Grant, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, MJ Ray, 2008/01/30
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Andrew Savory, 2008/01/30
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Jon Grant, 2008/01/29