|
From: | Elinor Raymond |
Subject: | [fxvt-users] clothesline |
Date: | Tue, 26 Sep 2006 06:25:53 +0900 |
![]() Others dwelled very heavily on the second
point.
A driver already exists.
Further clarification as to exactly what that means
was not provided by the company.
Ones you see in the news every day.
If it works, we can live with it, although perhaps
the VFS could be made smarter.
Further clarification as to exactly what that means
was not provided by the company. Even though there are many many companies doing so.
They have not even replied to our mail.
On the other hand, our CPU usage went way down. In
other words, it is possible to build an UltraSparc III kernel on an UltraSparc III,
and then reboot to that new kernel. About half of the code is a framework to permit
RAID controller drivers to do the right thing.
But there's nothing which leaps out and says
'right', either.
On the other hand, our CPU usage went way down. If
it works, we can live with it, although perhaps the VFS could be made
smarter.
Nobody wants two different suspend modules in the
kernel. Kind of hard to argue that it is not politically differentiated, isn't
it?
Not all the code is commited yet, but most of it
is.
Then help us fix it.
I for one have already decided that I will never
recommend an Intel product to anyone ever if there is choice. But there's nothing
which leaps out and says 'right', either.
Without these firmware files included in OpenBSD,
users must go do some click-through license at some web site to get at the files.
This feature is transparent - if enabled it just makes these timers much more
accurate than the current HZ resolution. And operating system vendors who reuse our
code. Without these firmware files included in OpenBSD, users must go do some
click-through license at some web site to get at the files. On the other hand, our
CPU usage went way down.
Looking to the development process, Theo talks
about recent and future "mini-hackathons", small and focused OpenBSD development
gatherings. Several vendors including Symbol, Zydas, and Atmel have responded
favorably, licensing their firmwares so that they can be distributed freely with
OpenBSD.
txt, almost two years since we publicly announced
to the world that devfs would be removed from the kernel tree.
|
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |