Re: [PATCH] Use `static const' where possible

[Andreas Rottmann]

address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Hi,
>
> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> #   Slight C code generation improvements.
>> #   
>> #   * guile/g-wrap/guile.scm (function-wrapper-cg): Use `static const' 
>> storage
>> #     for `typespecs'.  Don't use `scm_values ()' when all out parameters are
>> #     invisible.
>
> This should have been two patches, especially since the second part in
> this patch was broken.  Please apply the attached patch right after the
> previous one.
>
I just merged your other patch; when trying to merge this patch I got:

bzr: ERROR: Revision address@hidden not present in inventory

I would appreciate if you could publish your branch and/or resend your
changes so that I can apply them. Also, instead of (long) commit
messages, please use the ChangeLog.

Regards & Thanks,
-- 
Andreas Rottmann         | address@hidden      | address@hidden | address@hidden
http://rotty.uttx.net    | GnuPG Key: http://rotty.uttx.net/gpg.asc
Fingerprint              | C38A 39C5 16D7 B69F 33A3  6993 22C8 27F7 35A9 92E7
v2sw7MYChw5pr5OFma7u7Lw2m5g/l7Di6e6t5BSb7en6g3/5HZa2Xs6MSr1/2p7 hackerkey.com

I have a truly elegant proof of the  above, but it is too long to
fit into this .signature file.